Clinical and electrophysiological parameters distinguishing acute‐onset chronic inflammatory demyelinating polyneuropathy from acute inflammatory demyelinating polyneuropathy |
| |
Authors: | Annie Dionne MD Michael W. Nicolle MD DPhil Angelika F. Hahn MD |
| |
Affiliation: | 1. Department of Clinical Neurological Sciences, Université Laval, 1401 18 rue, Québec City, Québec G1J 1Z4, Canada;2. Department of Clinical Neurological Sciences, University of Western Ontario, London, Ontario, Canada |
| |
Abstract: | Up to 16% of chronic inflammatory demyelinating polyneuropathy (CIDP) patients may present acutely. We performed a retrospective chart review on 30 acute inflammatory demyelinating polyneuropathy (AIDP) and 15 acute‐onset CIDP (A‐CIDP) patients looking for any clinical or electrophysiological parameters that might differentiate AIDP from acutely presenting CIDP. A‐CIDP patients were significantly more likely to have prominent sensory signs. They were significantly less likely to have autonomic nervous system involvement, facial weakness, a preceding infectious illness, or need for mechanical ventilation. With regard to electrophysiological features, neither sural‐sparing pattern, sensory ratio >1, nor the presence of A‐waves was different between the two groups. This study suggests that patients presenting acutely with a demyelinating polyneuropathy and the aforementioned clinical features should be closely monitored as they may be more likely to have CIDP at follow‐up. Muscle Nerve, 2010 |
| |
Keywords: | acute inflammatory demyelinating polyneuropathy chronic inflammatory demyelinating polyneuropathy clinical predictors electrophysiology sural sparing |
|
|