首页 | 本学科首页   官方微博 | 高级检索  
检索        


Electrical stimulation impairs early functional recovery and accentuates skeletal muscle atrophy after sciatic nerve crush injury in rats
Authors:Davilene Gigo‐Benato MD  Thiago Luiz Russo PhD  Stefano Geuna PhD  Natalia Rezende Santa Rosa Domingues  Tania Fátima Salvini PhD  Nivaldo Antonio Parizotto PhD
Institution:1. Unit of Thermophototherapy, Department of Physical Therapy, Federal University of S?o Carlos, Rodovia Washington Luis, Km 235, CP 676, CEP 13.565‐905, S?o Carlos, SP, Brazil;2. Unit of Skeletal Muscle Plasticity, Department of Physical Therapy, Federal University of S?o Carlos, S?o Carlos, SP, Brazil;3. Department of Clinical and Biological Sciences, University of Turin, San Luigi Hospital, Regione Gonzole, Orbassano, Italy
Abstract:Neuromuscular recovery after peripheral nerve lesion depends on the regeneration of severed axons that re‐establish their functional connection with the denervated muscle. The aim of this study was to determine the effects of electrical stimulation (ES) on the neuromuscular recovery after nerve crush injury in rats. Electrical stimulation was carried out on the tibialis anterior (TA) muscle after sciatic nerve crush injury in a rat model. Six ES sessions were administered every other day starting from day 3 postinjury until the end of the experiment (day 14). The sciatic functional index was calculated. Muscle excitability, neural cell adhesion molecule (N‐CAM) expression, and muscle fiber cross‐sectional area (CSA) were accessed from TA muscle. Regenerated sciatic nerves were analyzed by light and confocal microscopy. Both treated (crush+ES) and untreated (crush) groups had their muscle weight and CSA decreased compared with the normal group (P < 0.05). Electrical stimulation accentuated muscle fiber atrophy more in the crush+ES than in the crush group (P < 0.05). N‐CAM expression increased in both crush and crush+ES groups compared with the normal group (P < 0.05). Regenerated nerves revealed no difference between the crush and crush+ES groups. Nevertheless, functional recovery at day 14 post‐injury was significantly lower in crush+ES group compared with the crush group. In addition, the crush+ES group had chronaxie values significantly higher on days 7 and 13 compared with the crush group, which indicates a decrease in muscle excitability in the crush+ES animals. The results of this study do not support a benefit of the tested protocol of ES during the period of motor nerve recovery following injury. Muscle Nerve, 2010
Keywords:electrical stimulation nerve injury  neuromuscular impairment  rehabilitation  skeletal muscle
设为首页 | 免责声明 | 关于勤云 | 加入收藏

Copyright©北京勤云科技发展有限公司  京ICP备09084417号