首页 | 本学科首页   官方微博 | 高级检索  
     

晚期非小细胞肺癌循环血管内皮细胞水平的研究
引用本文:Huang C,Li K,Wei XY,Niu RF,Sun Y,Wang JW,Zhu YZ,Xu LY,Liu XQ,Gao HJ,Zhou JM,Wang XW. 晚期非小细胞肺癌循环血管内皮细胞水平的研究[J]. 中华肿瘤杂志, 2006, 28(10): 780-783
作者姓名:Huang C  Li K  Wei XY  Niu RF  Sun Y  Wang JW  Zhu YZ  Xu LY  Liu XQ  Gao HJ  Zhou JM  Wang XW
作者单位:1. 300060,天津,天津医科大学附属肿瘤医院内三科
2. 300060,天津,天津医科大学附属肿瘤医院中心实验室
3. 中国医学科学院肿瘤医院内科
4. 北京胸部肿瘤医院内科
5. 解放军三○七医院肿瘤一科
6. 天津胸科医院胸内二科
7. 山东大学齐鲁医院肿瘤内科
基金项目:吴阶平基金会临床科研专项基金资助项目(04101002)
摘    要:
目的分析晚期非小细胞肺癌(NSCLC)患者治疗前后外周血中循环血管内皮细胞(CEC)的变化,探讨CEC在NSCLC中的应用价值。方法采用NP方案联合内皮抑素(治疗组)及单用NP方案(对照组)治疗晚期NSCLC 67例,流式细胞法检测治疗前后外周血CEC数量及细胞角蛋白(CK)水平。结果治疗组临床有效率为44.4%,对照组为27.3%(P=0.176);治疗组临床受益率为80.0%,对照组为50.0%(P=0.012)。治疗组肿瘤进展时间(TTP)为146.7 d,对照组为91.1 d (P=0.061)。当TTP的cut-off值>170时,两组TTP比较,差异有统计学意义(cut-off值=170,P= 0.034;cut-off值=180,P=0.009)。治疗组CEC平均下降(0.29±0.47)%,对照组平均下降(0.01±0.43)%(P=0.033)。全部患者治疗前CEC与CK水平呈正相关(r=0.381,P=0.013),治疗后亦呈正相关(r=0.450,P=0.004)。结论化疗联合血管靶向治疗晚期NSCLC优于单用化疗,CEC是一个较好的预测疗效的指标。

关 键 词:非小细胞肺癌 循环血管内皮细胞
收稿时间:2005-10-16
修稿时间:2005-10-16

Circulating endothelial cells in the peripheral blood of advanced NSCLC patients
Huang Chun,Li Kai,Wei Xi-Yin,Niu Rui-Fang,Sun Yan,Wang Jin-Wan,Zhu Yun-Zhong,Xu Li-Yan,Liu Xiao-Qing,Gao Hong-Jun,Zhou Jing-Min,Wang Xiu-Wen. Circulating endothelial cells in the peripheral blood of advanced NSCLC patients[J]. Chinese Journal of Oncology, 2006, 28(10): 780-783
Authors:Huang Chun  Li Kai  Wei Xi-Yin  Niu Rui-Fang  Sun Yan  Wang Jin-Wan  Zhu Yun-Zhong  Xu Li-Yan  Liu Xiao-Qing  Gao Hong-Jun  Zhou Jing-Min  Wang Xiu-Wen
Affiliation:Department of Medical Oncology, Tianjin Cancer Institute & Hospital Tianjin Medical University, Tianjin 300060, China.
Abstract:
OBJECTIVE: To investigate the changes and clinical value of circulating endothelial cells (CEC) in the peripheral blood of advanced NSCLC patient. METHODS: Sixty-seven advanced NSCLC patients were randomly divided into either the treatment group with NP plus endostatin or control group with NP alone. Level of CEC and cytokeratin (CK) in the peripheral blood were measured by flow cytometry. RESULTS: The response rate and benefit rate was 44.4%, 80.0% in the treatment group, and 27.3%, 50.0% in the control group, respectively (P = 0.176 and P = 0.012). Time to tumor progression (TTP) was 146.7 days in the treatment group and 91.1 days in the control group (P = 0.061). However, when the cut-off of TTP was defined as > 170 days, there was a significant difference between two groups (cut-off = 170, P = 0.034; cut-off = 180, P = 0.009). The number of CEC decreased by 0.29 +/- 0.47 in the treatment group and by 0.01 +/- 0.43 in the control group (P = 0.033). The correlation between CEC and CK was found to be positive either before (r = 0.381, P = 0.013) or after the treatment (r = 0.450, P = 0.004). CONCLUSION: Chemotherapy combined with endostatin is superior to chemotherapy alone in the treatment of NSCLC. CEC, as a biomarker, may be useful in predicting the efficacy of the combined treatment.
Keywords:Non-small cell lung cancer   Circulating endothelial cells
本文献已被 CNKI 万方数据 PubMed 等数据库收录!
设为首页 | 免责声明 | 关于勤云 | 加入收藏

Copyright©北京勤云科技发展有限公司  京ICP备09084417号