首页 | 本学科首页   官方微博 | 高级检索  
     

国产与进口头孢吡肟治疗下呼吸道细菌性感染120例疗效与安全性
引用本文:辛小娟,袁喆,黄文祥,李崇智,朱伟民,于香安. 国产与进口头孢吡肟治疗下呼吸道细菌性感染120例疗效与安全性[J]. 中国新药与临床杂志, 2006, 25(5): 339-342
作者姓名:辛小娟  袁喆  黄文祥  李崇智  朱伟民  于香安
作者单位:1. 重庆医科大学附属第一医院,感染科,重庆,400016
2. 中国人民解放军第三军医大学西南医院,重庆,400038
3. 兰州医学院第二附属医院,甘肃,兰州,730000
摘    要:目的:评价国产头孢吡肟治疗下呼吸道细菌感染的疗效及安全性。方法:采用多中心随机双盲对照临床试验设计,选用121例18~65 a的病人随机分配到试验组(国产头孢吡肟)61例和对照组(进口头孢吡肟)60例。给药方案均为2 g,iv,gtt,bid,疗程为7~14 d。结果:试验组与对照组的痊愈率与有效率分别为66%,98%与80%,100%,细菌阳性率分别为79%与83%,细菌清除率分别为98%与100%,不良反应发生率分别为10%与3%(P>0.05)。结论:国产头孢吡肟是治疗下呼吸道细菌感染的有效和安全的药物,与进口头孢吡肟相当。

关 键 词:抗感染药  头孢吡肟  随机对照试验  双盲法  呼吸道感染  细菌感染
文章编号:1007-7669(2006)05-0339-04
收稿时间:2005-02-02
修稿时间:2005-02-022006-03-26

Safety and efficacy of domestic and imported cefepime in treatment of lower respiratory tract bacterial infection in 120 patients
XIN Xiao-juan,YUAN Zhe,HUANG Wen-xiang,LI Chong-zhi,ZHU Wei-min,YU Xiang-an. Safety and efficacy of domestic and imported cefepime in treatment of lower respiratory tract bacterial infection in 120 patients[J]. Chinese Journal of New Drugs and Clinical Remedies, 2006, 25(5): 339-342
Authors:XIN Xiao-juan  YUAN Zhe  HUANG Wen-xiang  LI Chong-zhi  ZHU Wei-min  YU Xiang-an
Affiliation:1. The First Affiliated Hospital of Chongqing Medical University, CHONGQING 400016, China; 2. Southwest Hospital, the Third Military Medical University of PLA, CHONGQING 400038, China; 3. The Second Affiliated Hospital of Lanzhou Medical University, Lanzhou GANSU 730000, China
Abstract:AIM:To evaluate the clinical efficacy and safety of domestic cefepime in the treatment of low- er respiratory tract bacterial infections.METHODS:A multi-center,randomized,double blind,parallel-group, comparative study of cefepime was eondueted among 121 patients with respiratory infections.They were random- ized into trial group(61 patients,treated with domestic cefepime,2 g,iv,gtt,bid,for 7-14 days)and control group (60 patients,treated with imported cefepime,2 g,iv,gtt,bid,for 7-14 days).RESULTS:The recovery and ef- fective rates were 66% and 98% in trial group,80% and 100% in control group;the positive rates of bacterial culture were 79% and 83%;the bacterial clearance rates were 98% and 100%;the incidence rates of adverse reactions were 10% and 3%,respectively.There were no significant differences between two groups(P>0.05). CONCLUSION:Domestic cefepime has the same safety and efficacy as imported one in the treatment of lower respiretory tract bacterial infection.
Keywords:anti-infective agents    cefepime    randomized controlled trials    double-blind method    respiratory tract infections   bacterial infections
本文献已被 CNKI 维普 万方数据 等数据库收录!
设为首页 | 免责声明 | 关于勤云 | 加入收藏

Copyright©北京勤云科技发展有限公司  京ICP备09084417号