Efficacy of anti-adhesive barriers in secondary thyroidectomy: an experimental study

HYPOTHESIS: This study was conducted to compare the effectiveness of two anti-adhesive barriers (Seprafilm and Interceed) for reducing adhesions after thyroidectomy in a rat model. The anti-adhesive barriers are suggested for use in repeated surgeries in general and the gynecologic fields in particular. STUDY DESIGN: Controlled, randomized study. METHODS: Twenty-eight male Wistar Albino rats that underwent right subtotal thyroidectomy were randomly assigned to three groups. One group received Seprafilm (n = 10), and the other received Interceed (n = 10) as anti-adhesive barriers. The third group was the control group (n = 8). At postoperative day 14, the rats were killed under general anesthesia, and the surgical fields were evaluated for the adhesion formation. The extent of the adhesion formation is scored from 0 (no adhesions) to 2 (fibrous adhesions that required sharp dissection). Histopathologically, chronic inflammation, histiocyte, fibroblast, fibrosis, collagen, vascularization, granuloma, giant cell, and fat necrosis were examined. RESULTS: All the subjects in the control group, 7 of 10 in the Interceed group, and 4 of 10 in the Seprafilm group needed to be dissected bluntly or sharply. There was significant difference between the Seprafilm and the control group (P < .05) whereas there was no significant difference between the Interceed group and the control group (P > .05). When examined histopathologically, the criteria showing adhesion, such as fibrosis, fibroblast, and collagen were higher in the control group compared with the Seprafilm and Interceed groups. There was no significant difference between the Seprafilm and Interceed groups, whereas a significant difference was found between these two groups and the control group. CONCLUSION: This study suggests that both Seprafilm and Interceed decrease the incidence of posthyroidectomy adhesions in a rat model. Both agents showed no foreign body reaction.