Mechanobiological oscillators control lymph flow

The ability of cells to sense and respond to physical forces has been recognized for decades, but researchers are only beginning to appreciate the fundamental importance of mechanical signals in biology. At the larger scale, there has been increased interest in the collective organization of cells and their ability to produce complex, “emergent” behaviors. Often, these complex behaviors result in tissue-level control mechanisms that manifest as biological oscillators, such as observed in fireflies, heartbeats, and circadian rhythms. In many cases, these complex, collective behaviors are controlled—at least in part—by physical forces imposed on the tissue or created by the cells. Here, we use mathematical simulations to show that two complementary mechanobiological oscillators are sufficient to control fluid transport in the lymphatic system: Ca²⁺-mediated contractions can be triggered by vessel stretch, whereas nitric oxide produced in response to the resulting fluid shear stress causes the lymphatic vessel to relax locally. Our model predicts that the Ca²⁺ and NO levels alternate spatiotemporally, establishing complementary feedback loops, and that the resulting phasic contractions drive lymph flow. We show that this mechanism is self-regulating and robust over a range of fluid pressure environments, allowing the lymphatic vessels to provide pumping when needed but remain open when flow can be driven by tissue pressure or gravity. Our simulations accurately reproduce the responses to pressure challenges and signaling pathway manipulations observed experimentally, providing an integrated conceptual framework for lymphatic function.Flow of fluid within the lymphatic system is central to many aspects of physiology, including fluid homeostasis and immune function, and poor lymphatic drainage results in significant morbidity in millions of patients each year (1). Although it is known that various mechanical and chemical perturbations can affect lymphatic pumping, there are still no pharmacological therapies for lymphatic pathologies. A fundamental understanding of how various signals coordinate lymphatic vessel function is a necessary first step toward development of treatments to restore fluid balance and enhance immunosurveillance.The lymphatic system consists of fluid-absorbing initial lymphatic vessels that converge to collecting lymphatic vessels, which transport lymph through lymph nodes and back to the blood circulation (2). The collecting lymphatic vessels actively transport fluid via contractions of their muscle-invested walls. Unidirectional flow is achieved by intraluminal valves that limit back flow. Unfortunately, lymphatic pumping is not always operational, and this can lead to lymphedema and immune dysfunction (3, 4).Much is known about the mechanisms responsible for the contractions of the vessel wall. As in blood vessels, the muscle cells that line lymphatic vessels respond to changes in Ca²⁺ concentration. Membrane depolarization results in an influx of Ca²⁺ to initiate the contractions, and this process can be modulated by neurotransmitters (5) or inflammatory mediators, which generally alter the frequency and amplitude of lymphatic pumping (4, 6). Many studies have also reported that physical distension, either by applying isometric stretch or by pressurizing the vessel can affect the phasic contractions (7–10). Interestingly, endothelial (11) and smooth muscle cells (12) have stretch-activated ion channels that can initiate Ca²⁺ mobilization in response to mechanical stresses. Thus, stretch may constitute an important trigger for the contraction phase of a pumping cycle.There are also complementary mechanisms for tempering the Ca²⁺-dependent contractions. The most notable is nitric oxide (NO), a vasodilator that acts at multiple points in the Ca²⁺-contraction pathway to modulate Ca²⁺ release and uptake, as well as the enzymes responsible for force production (13). Blocking or enhancing NO activity can dramatically affect pumping behavior (4, 14–17). Furthermore, lymphatic endothelial cells produce NO in response to fluid flow (16, 18, 19). Importantly, NO dynamics are faster than observed pumping frequencies, so flow-induced NO production is another potential mechanosignal involved in lymphatic regulation (20).