首页 | 本学科首页   官方微博 | 高级检索  
检索        


Developing an expert panel process to refine health outcome definitions in observational data
Institution:1. Auburn University, Harrison School of Pharmacy, Department of Pharmacy Care Systems, 020 Foy Hall, Auburn, AL 36849, USA;2. Hewlett-Packard Laboratories, 1501 Page Mill Road, MS 1140, Palo Alto, CA 94304, USA;3. Auburn University, Office of Information Technology, 300 Lem Morrison Drive, Auburn, AL 36849, USA
Abstract:ObjectivesDrug safety surveillance using observational data requires valid adverse event, or health outcome of interest (HOI) measurement. The objectives of this study were to develop a method to review HOI definitions in claims databases using (1) web-based digital tools to present de-identified patient data, (2) a systematic expert panel review process, and (3) a data collection process enabling analysis of concepts-of-interest that influence panelists’ determination of HOI.MethodsDe-identified patient data were presented via an interactive web-based dashboard to enable case review and determine if specific HOIs were present or absent. Criteria for determining HOIs and their severity were provided to each panelist. Using a modified Delphi method, six panelist pairs independently reviewed approximately 200 cases across each of three HOIs (acute liver injury, acute kidney injury, and acute myocardial infarction) such that panelist pairs independently reviewed the same cases. Panelists completed an assessment within the dashboard for each case that included their assessment of the presence or absence of the HOI, HOI severity (if present), and data contributing to their decision. Discrepancies within panelist pairs were resolved during a consensus process.ResultsDashboard development was iterative, focusing on data presentation and recording panelists’ assessments. Panelists reported quickly learning how to use the dashboard. The assessment module was used consistently. The dashboard was reliable, enabling an efficient review process for panelists. Modifications were made to the dashboard and review process when necessary to facilitate case review. Our methods should be applied to other health outcomes of interest to further refine the dashboard and case review process.ConclusionThe expert review process was effective and was supported by the web-based dashboard. Our methods for case review and classification can be applied to future methods for case identification in observational data sources.
Keywords:Administrative claims  Expert panel  Observational  Dashboard  Health outcome of interest
本文献已被 ScienceDirect 等数据库收录!
设为首页 | 免责声明 | 关于勤云 | 加入收藏

Copyright©北京勤云科技发展有限公司  京ICP备09084417号