| 对比分析DHPA法及ATB法鉴定微球菌 |
| |
| 引用本文： | 龚文波,何林,李勇,吴劲松,卢月梅.对比分析DHPA法及ATB法鉴定微球菌[J].中国卫生检验杂志,2002,12(5):519-520. |
| |
| 作者姓名： | 龚文波 何林 李勇 吴劲松 卢月梅 |
| |
| 作者单位： | 深圳市人民医院,广东,518020 |
| |
| 摘 要： | 目的]对比分析双歧层次鉴定法（DHPA法）与ATB法对微球菌鉴定的准确性与可比性。方法]用DHPA法、ATB法及ID32 SYAPH试条鉴定微球菌。结果]DHPA法和ATB法对微球菌科35个KIU鉴定的正确性分别为100％与94.3％;对331株临床分离微球菌的鉴定符合率为83.4％。在55株两种方法鉴定不符合的菌株中,有10株为ATB缺码,占鉴定不符合菌株的18.2％,而DHPA法无缺码现象。结论]DHPA法解决了ATB法存在的缺码或不能鉴定问题,是微球菌准确、快速、简便、经济和实用的鉴定方法。
|
| 关 键 词： | 微球菌 鉴定 双歧层次分析鉴定法 ATB法 |
| 文章编号： | 1004-8685(2002)05-519-02 |
| 修稿时间： | 2002年6月8日 |
Analysis and contrast of identification of Micrococcaceae by Dendrogram Herarchy Process Analytic (DHPA) identification method and ATB method |
| |
| Gong Wenbo,He Lin,Li Yong,et al..Analysis and contrast of identification of Micrococcaceae by Dendrogram Herarchy Process Analytic (DHPA) identification method and ATB method[J].Chinses Journal of Health Laboratory Technology,2002,12(5):519-520. |
| |
| Authors: | Gong Wenbo He Lin Li Yong |
| |
| Institution: | Gong Wenbo,He Lin,Li Yong,et al. The peoples hospital of ShenZhen,ShenZhen 518020. china |
| |
| Abstract: | Objective] To contrast veracity and relativity of identification of micrococcaceae by the Dendrogram Herarchy Process Analytic(DHPA)identification method and ATB method. Methods] The micrococcaceae were was indentified by DHPA method and ATB method and ID 32 STAPH strip. Results] The correct identification rate of DHPA method and ATB method was 83.4% for 331 strains of Micrococcaceae isolated from clinical specimens. Among 55 test codes of non- consistent identification Micrococcaceae, 10 test codes (18.2%)were miscode of ATB method. Conclusion] The DHPA method surmounted defects of ATB method in missing code or uniden-tifition.This method is accurate,rapid,simple,cheap and practical for inentificahion of clinical Micrococcaceae. |
| |
| Keywords: | Micrococcaceae Identification Dendrogram hierarchy process analytic ATB method |
| 本文献已被 CNKI 维普 万方数据 等数据库收录！ |
|
