Management of Early-stage Esophageal Neoplasia (MESEN) Consensus |
| |
Authors: | Alejandro Nieponice Adolfo E. Badaloni Blair A. Jobe Toshitaka Hoppo Carlos Pellegrini Vic Velanovich Gary W. Falk Kevin Reavis Lee Swanstrom Virender K. Sharma Fabio Nachman Franco F. Ciotola Luis E. Caro Cecilio Cerisoli Demetrio Cavadas Luis Durand Figueroa Daniel Pirchi Michael Gibson Santiago Elizalde Henry Cohen |
| |
Affiliation: | 1. Department of Surgery, University of Favaloro, Av. Belgrano 1746, C1093AAS, Buenos Aires, Argentina 2. Department of Surgery, West Penn Allegheny Health System, Pittsburgh, PA, USA 3. Department of Surgery, University of Washington, Seattle, WA, USA 4. Department of Surgery, University of South Florida, Tampa, FL, USA 5. Gastroenterology Division, Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, USA 6. Department of Surgery, Oregon Center for Clinical Investigations, Portland, OR, USA 7. Gastroenterology Unit, Arizona Center for Digestive Health, Gilbert, AZ, USA 8. Gastroenterology Unit, GEDYT, Buenos Aires, Argentina 9. Department of Surgery, Hospital Italiano de Buenos Aires, Buenos Aires, Argentina 10. Department of Surgery, Hospital de Clínicas, Buenos Aires, Argentina 11. Gastroenterology Unit, Hospital Británico, Buenos Aires, Argentina 12. Oncology Division, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA, USA 13. Department of Gastroenterology, University of Montevideo, Montevideo, Uruguay
|
| |
Abstract: | Background Treatment of esophageal adenocarcinoma often involves surgical resection. Newer technologies in interventional endoscopy have led to a substantial paradigm shift in the management of early-stage neoplasia in Barrett’s esophagus comprising high-grade dysplasia (HGD), intramucosal carcinoma, and, in some cases, submucosal carcinoma. However, there has been no consensus regarding the indications for esophageal preservation in these cases. In this work, consensus guidelines were established for the management of early-stage esophageal neoplasia considering clinically relevant aspects (age, comorbidities, and social environment) in each scenario. Methods Seventeen experts were invited to participate based on their background and clinical expertise at high-volume centers. A questionnaire was created that included four clinical scenarios covering a wide range of situations within HGD and/or early esophageal neoplasia, particularly where controversies are likely to exist. Each of the clinical scenarios was open to discussion subdivided by patient age (20, 50, and 80 s). For each clinical scenario an expert was chosen to defend that position. Each defense triggered a subsequent discussion during a consensus meeting. Conclusions of that discussion together with an accompanying literature analysis allowed experts to confirm or change their original choices and served as the basis for the recommendations stated in this article. Results There was 100 % consensus supporting esophageal preservation in patients with HGD, independent of patient age or Barrett’s length. In patients with T1a adenocarcinoma, consensus for preservation was not reached (65 %) for young and middle-aged individuals but was supported for elderly patients (100 %). For T1b adenocarcinoma, consensus was reached for surgical resection (90 %), leaving organ preservation for patients with very low risk of nodal invasion or poor surgical candidates. Conclusion Advances in endoscopic imaging and therapy allow for organ preservation in most settings of early-stage neoplasia of the esophagus, provided that the patient understands the implications of this decision. |
| |
Keywords: | |
本文献已被 SpringerLink 等数据库收录! |
|