首页 | 本学科首页   官方微博 | 高级检索  
     


Skinfold thickness versus isotope dilution for body fat assessment during simulated microgravity: results from three bed-rest campaigns in men and women with and without countermeasures
Authors:Alexandre Zahariev  Audrey Bergouignan  Michel Caloin  Sylvie Normand  Guillemette Gauquelin-Koch  Claude Gharib  Stéphane Blanc
Affiliation:(1) Centre d’Ecologie et de Physiologie Energétiques CNRS UPR 9010, 23 rue Becquerel, 67087 Strasbourg, France;(2) Centre de Recherche en Nutrition Humaine, 2 rue Guillaume Paradin, 69272 Lyon, France;(3) Centre National d’Etudes Spatiales, Place Maurice, Quentin, 75000 Paris, France;(4) Laboratoire de Physiologie de l’Environnement Faculté de Médecine Grange, Blanche 8 rue, Rockefeller, 69373, Lyon, France
Abstract:Because body composition is altered during head-down bed rest (HDBR), body mass can not be used as an index of energy balance. Consequently diet allowances should not be based on body mass evolution but on fat mass changes. Though criticized, skinfold thickness (ST) is the costless, easiest and fastest method to use for such an objective. The aim of this study was to compare the percentage of body fat (%BF) estimated by ST with the isotope dilution of H218O. We compiled data from three HDBR campaigns, one on women (n=8) in November 1998 and two on the same men (n=8) in December 1997 (without countermeasure) and January 1998 (with thigh-cuffs countermeasure), according to a crossover design. Body composition was assessed before and after 6 days of HDBR. %BF was derived from the biceps, triceps, sub-scapular and sup-iliac ST according to Durnin and Wormersly (1974). Fat-free mass was measured on the same day by H218O dilution and fat mass was calculated by the difference with body mass and expressed as a percentage. Based on precision tests, the minimum measurable change by ST was 1.1%BF for single measurement point. Both intercepts (F 4,30=0.89, P=0.45) and slopes (F 4,30=0.74; P=0.57) of the ST versus dilution relationships were not affected by the periods (December vs January), experimental conditions (control vs HDBR vs HDBR + thigh cuffs) or sex allowing the derivation of a common relationship %BFst=0.94 × %BFdil (F 1,47=97.9, P<0.0001; non-significant intercept excluded) with a bias between methods of −1.7±2.0 %BF (95% CI: −5.8, 2.4 %BF). ST can be used to measure %BF during HDBR provided great care is placed on training and changes are higher than 1.1 %BF. If the method can be applied for in-flight energy balance monitoring given the high observed energy deficit, a tight monitoring of the individual nutritional status as needed during simulation appears, however, dubious based on this solely method.
Keywords:Energy balance  Head-down bed rest  18 oxygen  Gender
本文献已被 PubMed SpringerLink 等数据库收录!
设为首页 | 免责声明 | 关于勤云 | 加入收藏

Copyright©北京勤云科技发展有限公司  京ICP备09084417号