Calprotectin (S100A8/A9) should preferably be measured in EDTA-plasma; results from a longitudinal study of patients with rheumatoid arthritis |
| |
Authors: | Hilde Haugedal Nordal Magne K. Fagerhol Anne-Kristine Halse Hilde Berner Hammer |
| |
Affiliation: | 1. Broegelmann Research Laboratory, Department of Clinical Science, University of Bergen, Bergen, Norway;2. Department of Rheumatology, Haukeland University Hospital, Bergen, Norway;3. Prof. Fagerhol’s Research Laboratory, Oslo, Norway;4. Department of Rheumatology, Haukeland University Hospital, Bergen, Norway;5. Department of Clinical Science, University of Bergen, Bergen, Norway;6. Department of Rheumatology, Diakonhjemmet Hospital, Oslo, Norway |
| |
Abstract: | Calprotectin (S100A8/A9), a protein expressed in neutrophils and monocytes/macrophages in circulation and inflamed tissue, is associated with measures of disease activity in rheumatoid arthritis (RA) patients both when measured in ethylenediaminetetraacetic acid (EDTA)-plasma and in serum. We wanted to explore if EDTA-plasma or serum should be preferred for calprotectin as a marker of disease activity. Calprotectin was analysed in EDTA-plasma and serum by enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA) at baseline in 141 RA patients, starting biologic disease-modifying anti-rheumatic drugs (bDMARDs), and after three months. Differences between plasma and serum levels of calprotectin were assessed by Wilcoxon signed rank test. Variability was assessed by quartile coefficient of dispersion. Spearman’s test explored correlations between calprotectin in plasma and serum and between calprotectin (plasma or serum) and clinical/ultrasound (US) measures of disease activity. Bland Altman plots were used for method comparisons. Conventional inflammatory markers were evaluated for comparison. Calprotectin had similar variability when measured in plasma and serum, but there was a significant difference in concentrations between plasma and serum (p?.001). The correlation coefficients at baseline between calprotectin measured in plasma/serum and measures of disease activity were rs?=?0.62/0.46 for sum power Doppler score (PD), rs?=?0.60/0.48 for assessor’s global visual analogue scale (VAS), rs?=?0.59/0.43 for sum grey scale (GS) score and rs?=?0.47/0.37 for swollen joint count of 32, all p?.001. Similar differences were found after three months. Calprotectin measured in plasma showed the strongest associations with assessments of disease activity, and EDTA-plasma should preferably be used when evaluating disease activity in RA patients. |
| |
Keywords: | Leukocyte L1 antigen complex biomarkers immunoassays leukocyte blood proteins rheumatology |
|
|