在体肝脏3.0T1H-MR波谱匀场及抑水影响因素探讨

目的 探讨受检者的自身因素对在体肝脏1H-MRS自动预扫描中匀场和抑水效果的影响.方法 回顾性分析57例行肝脏1H-MRS检查受检者资料,其中正常受检者35名、慢性乙型肝炎5例、脂肪肝14例、脂肪肝合并慢性乙型肝炎3例.把受检者按是否抑水率(WS)≥90%及是否匀场线宽(LW)20 Hz分别分为2组,分别采用两独立样本的t检验比较2组的一般情况如身高、体重、体质量指数(BMI),采用卡方检验比较脂肪肝组与非脂肪肝组达到较好的LW和WS效果的比率.结果 抑水较好组47例和抑水不好组10例比较,平均身高[分别为(164.7±8.0)和(170.5±3.7)cm]、体重[分别为(61.8±10.4)和(73.4±5.4)kg]、BMI[分别为(22.7±3.2)和(25.2±1.3)kg/m2]及LW[分别为(17.7±3.7)和(24.6±6.3)Hz],差异均有统计学意义(t值分别为-3.488、-3.415、-4.002和-3.327,P值均<0.05).匀场较好组41例和匀场不好组16例比较,体重[分别为(62.2±11.6)和(68.1±6.1)kg],BMI[分别为(22.8±3.4)和(24.2±1.9)kg/m2],WS[分别为(93.0±2.7)%和(86.1±8.5)%],差异均有统计学意义(t值分别为-2.516、-2.024和3.213,P值均<0.05).脂肪肝组17例中,7例自动匀场LW≤20 Hz,无脂肪肝组40例中,34例自动匀场LW≤20 Hz,2组间差异有统计学意义(X2=11.347,P<0.05).脂肪肝组17例中,WS<90%者7例,无脂肪肝组40例中,无WS<90%患者,两者差异有统计学意义(X2=28.536,P<0.05).结论 肝脏的脂质沉积对1H-MRS匀场及抑水存在负性影响,体重及BMI大的受检者达到良好的匀场和抑水效果预期成功率低.

Exploration of factors influencing shimming and water suppression on hepatic 1H-MR spectroscopy in vivo on 3.0 T

Objective To characterize the clinical factors which influence water suppression and auto-shimming line width for liver 3.0 T 1H-MRS.Methods Fifty-seven cases with liver 1H-MR spectroscopy(1H-MRS) were retrospectively studied, including chronic type B hepatitis (n=5), fatty liver (n=14), chronic type B hepatitis combining fatty liver (n=3) and normal situation (n=35).Independent t test was used to characterize the difference of general condition (height, weight, body mass index etc.) between different water suppression effect groups and between different shimming effect groups.Using Chi-square test to analyze whether water suppression rate and auto-shimming line width between fatty liver groups and non-fatty liver exist significance difference .Results By comparing WS ≥90% (n=47)group with WS < 90% (n=10) group, the former showed smaller average height[(164.7±8.0) and (170.5±3.7) cm respectively], weight[(61.8±10.4) and (73.4±5.4) kg respectively], BMI [(22.7±3.2) and (25.2±1.3)kg/m2 respectively]and LW[(17.7±3.7)and(24.6±6.3) Hz respectively]than the latter (t=-3.488,-3.415,-4.002 and-3.327, P < 0.05).By comparing LW 20 Hz (n=41) group with LW 20 Hz (n=16) group, the former showed better water suppression rate [(93.0±2.7)% and (86.1±8.5)% respectively]than the latter(t=3.213,P <0.05), whereas larger weight[(62.2±11.6) and (68.1±6.1)kg respectively]and BMI[(22.8±3.4) and (24.2±1.9)kg/m2 respectively](t=-2.516,-2.024,P <0.05).LW≤20 Hz in the fatty liver and non-fatty liver group was 7/17 and 34/40, respectively (X2=11.347, P < 0.05).WS < 90% in the fatty liver and non-fatty liver group was 10/17 and 0/44, respectively (X2=28.536, P < 0.05) .Conclusion Hepatic steatosis exerts an adverse effect in water suppression and shimming.