Micro-CT in the Assessment of Pediatric Renal Osteodystrophy by Bone Histomorphometry |
| |
Authors: | Renata C. Pereira David S. Bischoff Dean Yamaguchi Isidro B. Salusky Katherine Wesseling-Perry |
| |
Affiliation: | *Department of Pediatrics, David Geffen School of Medicine at the University of California, Los Angeles, Los Angeles, California; and;†Department of Medicine, Veterans Affairs Sepulveda and David Geffen School of Medicine at the University of California, Los Angeles, Los Angeles, California |
| |
Abstract: |
Background and objectivesComputed tomography (CT) measurements can distinguish between cortical and trabecular bone density in vivo. High-resolution CTs assess both bone volume and density in the same compartment, thus potentially yielding information regarding bone mineralization as well. The relationship between bone histomorphometric parameters of skeletal mineralization and bone density from microcomputed tomography (μCT) measurements of bone cores from patients on dialysis has not been assessed.Design, setting, participants, & measurementsBone cores from 68 patients with ESRD (age =13.9±0.5 years old; 50% men) and 14 controls (age =15.3±3.8 years old; 50% men) obtained as part of research protocols between 1983 and 2006 were analyzed by bone histomorphometry and μCT.ResultsBone histomorphometric diagnoses in the patients were normal to high bone turnover in 76%, adynamic bone in 13%, and osteomalacia in 11%. Bone formation rate did not correlate with any μCT determinations. Bone volume measurements were highly correlated between bone histomorphometry and μCT (bone volume/tissue volume between the two techniques: r=0.70; P<0.001, trabecular thickness and trabecular separation: r=0.71; P<0.001, and r=0.56; P<0.001, respectively). Osteoid accumulation as determined by bone histomorphometry correlated inversely with bone mineral density as assessed by μCT (osteoid thickness: r=−0.32; P=0.01 and osteoid volume: r=−0.28; P=0.05). By multivariable analysis, the combination of bone mineral density and bone volume (as assessed by μCT) along with parathyroid hormone and calcium levels accounted for 38% of the variability in osteoid volume (by histomorphometry).ConclusionsMeasures of bone volume can be accurately assessed with μCT. Bone mineral density is lower in patients with excessive osteoid accumulation and higher in patients with adynamic, well mineralized bone. Thus, bone mineralization may be accurately assessed by μCT of bone biopsy cores. Additional studies are warranted to define the value of high-resolution CT in the prediction of bone mineralization in vivo. |
| |
Keywords: | renal osteodystrophy bone biopsy micro CT bone density calcification physiologic child humans kidney failure chronic renal dialysis |
|
|