首页 | 本学科首页   官方微博 | 高级检索  
     


Comparison of four mechanical methods to retrieve spermatozoa from testicular tissue
Authors:Verheyen, G.   De Croo, I.   Tournaye, H.   Pletincx, I.   Devroey, P.   Van Steirteghem, A.C.
Affiliation:Centre for Reproductive Medicine, University Hospital, Dutch-speaking Brussels Free University Laarbeeklaan 101, 1090 Brussels, Belgium
Abstract:To maximize the total number of spermatozoa which can be retrievedfrom a testicular biopsy, four mechanical methods for preparationwere compared. In all, 17 biopsies were divided into four equalfractions, which were weighed individually and prepared by roughshredding (control), fine mincing, vortexing and crushing (electricalPotter). After resuspension in an erythrocyte-lysing buffer,removal of the remaining tissue pieces, washing and centrifugation,the following parameters were evaluated: number of spermatozoaper 100 mg tissue, percentage motility, percentage vitalityand percentage normal morphology (strict Kruger criteria). Afterfurther purification by discontinuous Percoll centrifugation,the same parameters were assessed again. This procedure wasefficient in obtaining only spermatozoa in the final fraction.Before Percoll centrifugation, only minor differences betweenmethods were observed. Percoll centrifugation generally resultedin a pronounced loss of sperm cells, partly because of the abnormaldimensions of the eliminated cells. After Percoll centrifugation,treatment of the testicular tissue by fine mincing was the mosteffective method in terms of the total number of motile spermatozoaand percentage normal morphology.
Keywords:mechanical methods/sperm isolation/testicular biopsy
本文献已被 Oxford 等数据库收录!
正在获取引用信息,请稍候...
正在获取相似文献,请稍候...
设为首页 | 免责声明 | 关于勤云 | 加入收藏

Copyright©北京勤云科技发展有限公司  京ICP备09084417号