Bivalirudin versus heparin as an antithrombotic agent in patients who undergo percutaneous saphenous vein graft intervention with a distal protection device |
| |
Authors: | Rha Seung-Woon Kuchulakanti Pramod K Pakala Rajbabu Cheneau Edouard Pinnow Ellen Torguson Rebecca Pichard Augusto D Satler Lowell F Suddath William O Kent Kenneth M Lindsay Joseph Waksman Ron |
| |
Affiliation: | Division of Cardiology, Washington Hospital Center, Washington, DC, USA. |
| |
Abstract: | Bivalirudin (Angiomax) is increasingly used as a substitute for heparin in a variety of percutaneous coronary interventions, and data on its usage in saphenous vein graft interventions are limited. This retrospective, observational study evaluated the efficacy and safety of bivalirudin compared with heparin as an antithrombotic regimen in patients who underwent saphenous vein graft intervention with distal protection devices. We found that bivalirudin use is clinically safe and feasible, with fewer vascular and ischemic complications compared with heparin. |
| |
Keywords: | |
本文献已被 ScienceDirect PubMed 等数据库收录! |