首页 | 本学科首页   官方微博 | 高级检索  
     

综合治疗糖尿病痛性神经病变临床观察
引用本文:李樊荣,李红霞,常名空. 综合治疗糖尿病痛性神经病变临床观察[J]. 山西中医, 2013, 0(11): 14-15
作者姓名:李樊荣  李红霞  常名空
作者单位:长治市中医医院,山西046000
摘    要:目的:观察综合疗法治疗糖尿病痛性神经病变的疗效.方法:采用随机分组方法将100例病例分为两组,治疗组给予针、罐、熏、药四合疗法治疗,连续5周;对照组给予甲钴胺注射液1 000 μg静脉缓推,1次/d,连续5周.结果:治疗组显效20例,有效20例,无效10例,总有效率80.0%.对照组显效9例,有效21例,无效20例,总有效率60.0%.两组临床疗效及视觉模拟评分VAS均有显著差异(P<0.05),治疗组优于对照组.结论:中医针灸、拔罐、熏蒸、药物四合疗法治疗糖尿病痛性神经病变,疗效明显优于甲钴胺组.

关 键 词:糖尿病  痛性神经病变  综合疗法

Clinical Observation of Combined Therapy on Aching Diabetic Neuropathy
LI Fan-rong,LI Hong-xia,CHANG Ming-kong. Clinical Observation of Combined Therapy on Aching Diabetic Neuropathy[J]. Shanxi Journal of Traditional Chinese Medicine, 2013, 0(11): 14-15
Authors:LI Fan-rong  LI Hong-xia  CHANG Ming-kong
Affiliation:( Changzhi TCM Hospital in Shanxi, Changzhi, 046000, China)
Abstract:Objective: To observe the curative effect of combined therapy on the treatment of aching diabetic neuropathy. Methods: 100 cases were randomly divided into two groups. Treatment group was given to four thera- py treatment of acupuncture, caddy, fumigating and medicine for 5 weeks, control group was given to mecobal- amin injection 1 000 g with intravenous push, 1 times/d, for 5 consecutive weeks. Results : In treatment group 20 cases excellent, 20 ones effective, and 10 ones ineffective. The total effective rate was 80.0%. In control group 9 cases excellent, 21 ones effective, and 20 ones ineffective. The total effective rate was 60.0%. There was signifi- cant difference between the two groups on clinical effect and visual simulation score (VAS) , and treatment group was better than control group. Conclusion : Combined therapy of acupuncture, caddy, fumigating and medicine has obviously better effect on aching diabetic neuropathy than mecobalamin.
Keywords:diabetes mellitus   aching neuropathy   combined therapy
本文献已被 维普 等数据库收录!
设为首页 | 免责声明 | 关于勤云 | 加入收藏

Copyright©北京勤云科技发展有限公司  京ICP备09084417号