首页 | 本学科首页   官方微博 | 高级检索  
     

SPECT设备平面成像性能评估与验收测试
引用本文:邵明哲,陈英茂,姚树林,田嘉禾. SPECT设备平面成像性能评估与验收测试[J]. 中国医学装备, 2011, 0(12): 1-4
作者姓名:邵明哲  陈英茂  姚树林  田嘉禾
作者单位:解放军总医院核医学科;
基金项目:国家自然科学基金(60572003)
摘    要:
目的:对医疗设备SPECT验收测试,评估其平面成像性能指标,为临床患者检测的安全和临床图像质量的可靠性提供依据。方法:对GE公司的Infinia Hawkeye4型和西门子公司的Symbia T6型两种机型SPECT设备的平面成像指标固有空间分辨率、固有空间线性、固有能量分辨率、固有均匀性、最大计数率及系统平面灵敏度进行测试。结果:SPECT设备的两种机型其各项指标略有差别,对于固有空间分辨率及固有线性的性能指标,机型1略优于机型2,但对于系统平面灵敏度及能量分辨率,机型2略优于机型1。结论:SPECT设备两种机型的性能指标均达到了出厂标准,并且达到了临床诊断的需求。

关 键 词:SPECT  平面成像  性能评估  验收测试

SPECT performance evaluation and acceptance test
SHAO Ming-zhe,CHEN Ying-mao,YAO Shu-lin,et al. SPECT performance evaluation and acceptance test[J]. China Medical Equipment, 2011, 0(12): 1-4
Authors:SHAO Ming-zhe  CHEN Ying-mao  YAO Shu-lin  et al
Affiliation:SHAO Ming-zhe,CHEN Ying-mao,YAO Shu-lin,et al Department of Nuclear Medicine,General Hospital of PLA,Beijing 100853.
Abstract:
Objective:To evaluate SPECT planar imaging performances and conduct the acceptance test to provide basis for patient safety and image quality in clinical practice. Methods:SPECT planar imaging performances intrinsic spatial resolution, intrinsic spatial linearity, intrinsic energy resolution, intrinsic uniformity, maximum count rate and system planar sensitivity were tested for two types of SPECT devices. Results:There was a little difference between the performances of two types of SPECT devices. The intri...
Keywords:SPECT  Planar imaging  Performance evaluation  acceptance test  
本文献已被 CNKI 维普 等数据库收录!
设为首页 | 免责声明 | 关于勤云 | 加入收藏

Copyright©北京勤云科技发展有限公司  京ICP备09084417号