Discriminating adaptive attributions: Agreement between self-report and objective ratings

According to the reformulated learned helplessness model of depression, causal attributions are an important mediator of the effects on mood of positive and negative experiences. Adaptive attributions for negative events are assumed to be external, unstable, and specific. In the present study, subjects exposed to one of two attribution training procedures or a control condition made attributions for hypothetical events under neutral and adaptive instructional sets. Attributions were rated by subjects and coders blind to the purpose of the study. Results indicated that subjects' views of adaptive causal attributions were congruent with predictions from the learned helplessness model. The ratings of the objective coders indicated that subjects' attributions really did change in response to the adaptive instructions in the predicted direction. Implications of these results for the reformulated learned helplessness model and depression therapies that include an attribution retraining component are discussed.The authors would like to thank Dan Russell for his very helpful comments on earlier drafts of this paper.