首页 | 本学科首页   官方微博 | 高级检索  
     


Validierung der deutschen Version der regionalen Schmerzskala zur Diagnose des Fibromyalgiesyndroms
Authors:Dr. W. Häuser  S. Schild  M. Kosseva  S. Hayo  H. von Wilmowski  R. Alten  J. Langhorst  W. Hofmann  J. Maus  H. Glaesmer
Affiliation:1. Klinik für Innere Medizin I, Klinikum Saarbrücken GmbH, Winterberg 1, 66119, Saarbrücken, Deutschland
2. Klinik für Psychosomatische Medizin und Psychotherapie, Technische Universit?t München, München, Deutschland
3. Klinik für Rheumatologie, Knappschaftskrankenhaus Püttlingen, Püttlingen, Deutschland
4. Klinik für Innere Medizin II, Schlossparkklinik, Berlin, Deutschland
5. Klinik für Innere Medizin V (Integrative Medizin), Universit?t Essen-Duisburg, Kliniken Essen-Mitte, Essen, Deutschland
6. Klinik für Psychiatrie und Psychotherapie, SHG-Kliniken Sonnenberg Saarbrücken, Saarbrücken, Deutschland
7. Klinik für Psychosomatische Medizin und Psychotherapie, Caritas Klinik St. Theresia, Saarbrücken, Deutschland
8. Abteilung für Medizinische Psychologie und Soziologie, Universit?t Leipzig, Leipzig, Deutschland
Abstract:

Objective

Use of the American College of Rheumatology classification criteria for the clinical diagnosis of fibromyalgia syndrome (FMS) is under debate. The Regional Pain Scale (RPS) had been developed for the diagnosis of FMS in clinical practice and in survey settings (survey criteria of FMS). So far a German version has not been validated.

Methods

A total of 216 patients with FMS, 53 with active rheumatoid arthritis (RA) and 60 with depressive disorder, recruited from clinical institutions completed the RPS. Forty-three patients with FMS filled in the RPS within 8 weeks a second time.

Results

The intraclass coefficient of FMS diagnosis after 8 weeks was 0.78 (test-retest reliability). The 7-day interval of pain was criticized by physicians. The absence of some articular pain regions was criticized by patients (face validity). The concordance of FMS diagnoses to survey and ACR criteria was 84.7% (±1.1); 45.3% of the patients with RA and 38.3% of the patients with depressive disorder met the survey criteria of FMS (discriminant validity).

Conclusion

The RPS has good reliability and convergent validity, but limited discriminant validity. The RPS is suited as a screening instrument for the diagnosis of FMS in clinical practice.
Keywords:
本文献已被 SpringerLink 等数据库收录!
设为首页 | 免责声明 | 关于勤云 | 加入收藏

Copyright©北京勤云科技发展有限公司  京ICP备09084417号