首页 | 本学科首页   官方微博 | 高级检索  
     

烧伤中心细菌耐药性分析
引用本文:许伟石 孙珍. 烧伤中心细菌耐药性分析[J]. 中华整形烧伤外科杂志, 1998, 14(3): 199-202
作者姓名:许伟石 孙珍
摘    要:
研究烧伤中心广泛应用第三代头孢菌素背景下细菌耐药性。方法 采用纸片扩散法。结果 259株革兰氏阴性杆菌对头孢噻肟,头胞曲松,头孢哌酮和头孢他啶全部耐药的菌株占31%,头孢酮/舒巴坦可使52%耐药菌株恢复敏感性。伊米配能和环丙沙星对铜绿假单力,无硝不动杆菌,肠杆菌科耐药率分别为23.8%和51.2%,28.6%和21.4%,9.9%和20.4%。

关 键 词:烧伤 细菌 耐药性 头孢菌素

An analysis of bacterial resistance to antimicrobial agents in a burn centre]
W Xu,Z Sun,X Chen. An analysis of bacterial resistance to antimicrobial agents in a burn centre][J]. , 1998, 14(3): 199-202
Authors:W Xu  Z Sun  X Chen
Affiliation:Shanghai Burn Institute, Rui Jing Hospital, Shanghai Second Medical University.
Abstract:
OBJECTIVE: To investigate bacterial resistance to antimicrobial agents in the background of extensive employment of third-generation cephalosporins in the treatment of burn infection. METHODS: Bacterial susceptibility testing was carried out using Kirby-Bauer method. RESULTS: Out of 259 Gram negative bacilli isolates, 31% of these strains were all resistant to cefotaxime, ceftriaxone, cefoperazone and ceftazidime. In vitro test, susceptibility of 52% third-generation cephlosporins resistant strains were restored by cefoperazone/sulbactum. 23.8% of P. aeruginosa were resistant to imipenem, 51.2% to ciprofloxacin. 28.6% of A. anitratum were resistant to imipenem, 21.4% to ciprofloxacin. 9.9% of enterobacteriaceae were resistant to imipenem, 20.4% to ciprofloxacin. 26.9% of MRSA were resistant to imipenem, 73% to ciprofloxacin. No norvancomycin resistance was detected. 2.7% of E. faecalis were resistant to norvancomycin. CONCLUSION: It is likely that the observed resistance to third-generation cephalosporins may be partially due to chromosome-mediated type-1 beta- lactamase.
Keywords:
本文献已被 维普 等数据库收录!
设为首页 | 免责声明 | 关于勤云 | 加入收藏

Copyright©北京勤云科技发展有限公司  京ICP备09084417号