A Common Variant of Staphylococcal Cassette Chromosome mec Type IVa in Isolates from Copenhagen,Denmark, Is Not Detected by the BD GeneOhm Methicillin-Resistant Staphylococcus aureus Assay

Rapid tests for detection of methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) carriage are important to limit the transmission of MRSA in the health care setting. We evaluated the performance of the BD GeneOhm MRSA real-time PCR assay using a diverse collection of MRSA isolates, mainly from Copenhagen, Denmark, but also including international isolates, e.g., USA100-1100. Pure cultures of 349 MRSA isolates representing variants of staphylococcal cassette chromosome mec (SCCmec) types I to V and 103 different staphylococcal protein A (spa) types were tested. In addition, 53 methicillin-susceptible Staphylococcus aureus isolates were included as negative controls. Forty-four MRSA isolates were undetectable; of these, 95% harbored SCCmec type IVa, and these included the most-common clone in Copenhagen, spa t024-sequence type 8-IVa. The false-negative MRSA isolates were tested with new primers (analyte-specific reagent [ASR] BD GeneOhm MRSA assay) supplied by Becton Dickinson (BD). The ASR BD GeneOhm MRSA assay detected 42 of the 44 isolates that were false negative in the BD GeneOhm MRSA assay. Combining the BD GeneOhm MRSA assay with the ASR BD GeneOhm MRSA assay greatly improved the results, with only two MRSA isolates being false negative. The BD GeneOhm MRSA assay alone is not adequate for MRSA detection in Copenhagen, Denmark, as more than one-third of our MRSA isolates would not be detected. We recommend that the BD GeneOhm MRSA assay be evaluated against the local MRSA diversity before being established as a standard assay, and due to the constant evolution of SCCmec cassettes, a continuous global surveillance is advisable in order to update the assay as necessary.Methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) is a common nosocomial pathogen in countries all over the world. In recent years, community-associated MRSA (CA-MRSA) has become increasingly prevalent and has shown potential to cause health care-associated bloodstream infections (8, 26). Screening and isolation of MRSA-positive patients is essential to control the transmission of MRSA in hospitals (16, 24). However, conventional detection of MRSA by culture takes at least 48 h before a preliminary result is available, and as patients in many countries are only isolated when they are recognized as MRSA positive, the risk of having already transmitted MRSA is high. The real-time PCR BD GeneOhm MRSA assay (Becton Dickinson [BD] Diagnostics GeneOhm; San Diego, CA), formerly called IDI-MRSA, is one of a number of commercial kits for rapid MRSA detection directly from nasal swabs (7) and is based on primers developed by Huletsky et al. (18). The forward primers bind to the J3 region of the staphylococcal cassette chromosome mec (SCCmec), and the reverse primer binds in the orfX region that is specific for Staphylococcus aureus. At least seven SCCmec types are known (types I to VII) (3), and several subtypes, especially of type IV, have been described (21, 27).The BD GeneOhm MRSA assay has been tested in a number of studies (4, 5, 10, 11, 13-15, 22, 23, 25, 29-31). Most studies screened hospitalized patients, but only two studies described the SCCmec types of their MRSA isolates (15, 25). Therefore, it is possible that only a few predominant hospital clones with the same SCCmec types were tested. In Denmark, different CA-MRSA clones dominate and MRSA isolates mainly harbor SCCmec types IV (85%) and V (6%) (2). In-house testing with the Huletsky primers (18) revealed that they did not amplify a PCR fragment from our most-common MRSA clone, spa t024-sequence type 8 (ST8)-IVa. Based on this finding and with the knowledge of the high number of type IV subtypes known, we were interested in finding out whether the BD GeneOhm MRSA assay could detect MRSA isolates from a collection that included mainly CA-MRSA strains. We tested 349 MRSA isolates representing variants of SCCmec types I to V. Furthermore, we chose MRSA isolates of different staphylococcal protein A (spa) types to have a broad range of genetic backgrounds, testing the hypothesis that the same SCCmec type might have minor differences in different MRSA lineages and that these differences could be in the primer regions of the assay.