Impact of probe pressure variability on prostate localization for ultrasound-based image-guided radiotherapy |
| |
Authors: | Marie Fargier-Voiron,Benoî t Presles,Pascal Pommier,Simon Rit,Alexandre Munoz,Hervé Liebgott,David Sarrut,Marie-Claude Biston |
| |
Affiliation: | 1. CREATIS, CNRS UMR5220, Inserm U1044, INSA-Lyon, Université Lyon 1, Villeurbanne, France;2. Léon Bérard Cancer Center, University of Lyon, France |
| |
Abstract: |
PurposeTo evaluate the impact of transabdominal probe pressure on prostate positioning with an intramodality ultrasound (US) image-guided-radiotherapy system and to quantify pressure variability over the treatment course.Material and methods8 prostate cancer patients (group A) and 17 healthy volunteers underwent 3 consecutive US images with increasing probe pressure levels, and 1 CT acquisition for the group A only. Prostate positions were compared after manual registration of the first US image contour projected on 2 others. Group A’s pressure levels were quantified by measuring skin-to-skin distances between corresponding CT–US images. The same methodology was used on paired CT/CBCT–US images acquired during treatments of 18 prostate cancer patients to determine whether the different pressure levels applied to the group A were close to the clinical practices and to quantify pressure variability along the treatment course.Results84% of 3D prostate displacements were above 2 mm for at least one pressure level. Probe pressures deliberately applied were similar to the ones observed clinically. The latter drastically varied between sessions.ConclusionEven with an intramodality system, probe pressure can impact prostate localization because of the pressure variability along the treatment course. Therefore, margins should be expanded from 0.5 to 1.2 mm to ensure treatment accuracy. |
| |
Keywords: | IGRT Ultrasound Prostate Probe pressure |
本文献已被 ScienceDirect 等数据库收录! |
|