首页 | 本学科首页   官方微博 | 高级检索  
     


Hospital reforms in 11 Central and Eastern European countries between 2008 and 2019: a comparative analysis
Affiliation:1. Institute of Public Health, Faculty of Health Sciences, Jagiellonian University Medical College, Krakow, Poland;2. National Institute of Public Health, Ljubljana, Slovenia;3. Riga Stradiņš University, Riga, Latvia;4. Institute of Economic Studies, Faculty of Social Sciences, Charles University, Prague, Czech Republic;5. Medical University of Varna, Bulgaria;6. School of Medicine, University of Zagreb, Croatia;7. international health financing consultant, Tallinn, Estonia;8. Department of Public Health, Institute of Health Sciences, Faculty of Medicine, Vilnius University, Lithuania;9. National School of Public Health Management and Professional Development, Bucharest, Romania;10. Ministry of Health of the Slovak Republic, Bratislava, Slovakia;11. Health Services Management Training Centre, Semmelweis University, Budapest, Hungary;12. Department of Health Care Management, Technische Universität Berlin, Germany;13. European Observatory on Health Systems and Policies, Brussels, Belgium
Abstract:This paper aims to: (1) provide a brief overview of hospital sector characteristics in 11 Central and Eastern European countries (Bulgaria, Czech Republic, Estonia, Croatia, Latvia, Lithuania, Hungary, Poland, Romania, Slovakia, Slovenia); (2) compare recent (2008 – 2019) hospital reforms in these countries; and (3) identify common trends, success factors and challenges for reforms. Methods applied involved five stages: (1) a theoretical framework of hospital sector reforms was developed; (2) basic quantitative data characterizing hospital sectors were compared; (3) a scoping review was performed to identify an initial list of reforms per country; (4) the list was sent to national researchers who described the top three reforms based on a standardized questionnaire; (5) received questionnaires were analysed and validated with available literature. Results indicate that the scope of conducted reforms is very broad. Yet, reforms related to hospital sector governance and changes in purchasing and payment systems are much more frequent than reforms concerning relations with other providers. Most governance reforms aimed at transforming hospital infrastructure, improving financial management and/or improving quality of care, while purchasing and payment reforms focused on limiting hospital activities and/or on incentivising a shift to ambulatory/day care. Three common challenges included the lack of a comprehensive approach; unclear outcomes; and political influence. Given similar reform areas across countries, there is considerable potential for shared learning.
Keywords:hospital  reform  hospital governance  hospital payment  cross-country comparison
本文献已被 ScienceDirect 等数据库收录!
设为首页 | 免责声明 | 关于勤云 | 加入收藏

Copyright©北京勤云科技发展有限公司  京ICP备09084417号