首页 | 本学科首页   官方微博 | 高级检索  
     

2018—2019年石台县野外灭鼠控制血吸虫病传染源效果观察
引用本文:何家昶,陶伟,汪天平,高风华,陈雪峰,许晓娟,代波,丁宋军,刘婷,李异,汪昊,茅维飞,章乐生,张世清. 2018—2019年石台县野外灭鼠控制血吸虫病传染源效果观察[J]. 热带病与寄生虫学, 2022, 20(5): 257-259+263
作者姓名:何家昶  陶伟  汪天平  高风华  陈雪峰  许晓娟  代波  丁宋军  刘婷  李异  汪昊  茅维飞  章乐生  张世清
作者单位:1. 安徽省血吸虫病防治研究所,安徽合肥230601;2. 石台县疾病预防控制中心;3. 池州市疾病预防控制保健中心
基金项目:安徽省医疗卫生重点专科建设项目
摘    要:
目的 观察在以野鼠作为主要传染源的血吸虫病流行区,通过野外灭鼠配合常规防治措施控制血吸虫病动物传染源的效果。方法 在石台县选择3个血吸虫病流行村,其中试验村(矶滩村和石泉村)采取常规防治措施结合野外灭鼠措施(1次),对照村(西柏村)仅采取常规防治措施,一年后评估野鼠密度及其血吸虫感染情况。结果 试验村矶滩村灭鼠前后野鼠密度分别为9.91%(75/757)、4.99%(34/681),差异有统计学意义(χ2=12.362,P<0.05);石泉村灭鼠前后野鼠密度分别为5.31%(32/623)、3.28%(17/519),差异无统计学意义(χ2=2.756,P>0.05);对照村西柏村防治前后野鼠密度分别为3.44%(20/582)、4.45%(21/472),差异无统计学意义(χ2=0.715,P>0.05)。试验村矶滩村灭鼠前后野鼠感染率分别为36.00%(27/75)、17.65%(6/34),石泉村灭鼠前后野鼠感染率分别为18.75%(6/32)、11.76%(2/17),对照村西柏村防治前后野鼠感...

关 键 词:血吸虫病  传染源控制  野鼠  效果观察  石台县
收稿时间:2022-02-24

Preliminary observation on the efficacy to check infection source of schistosomiasis by controlling wild rodents
HE Jia-chang,TAO Wei,WANG Tian-ping,GAO Feng-hua,CHEN Xue-feng,XU Xiao-juan,Dai Bo,DING Song-jun,LIU Ting,LI Yi,WANG Hao,MAO Wei-fei,ZHANG Le-sheng,ZHANG Shi-qing. Preliminary observation on the efficacy to check infection source of schistosomiasis by controlling wild rodents[J]. Journal of Tropical Diseases and Parasitology, 2022, 20(5): 257-259+263
Authors:HE Jia-chang  TAO Wei  WANG Tian-ping  GAO Feng-hua  CHEN Xue-feng  XU Xiao-juan  Dai Bo  DING Song-jun  LIU Ting  LI Yi  WANG Hao  MAO Wei-fei  ZHANG Le-sheng  ZHANG Shi-qing
Affiliation:1. Anhui Institute of Schistosomiasis Control,Hefei 230601, Anhui Province, China;2. Shitai County Center for Disease Control and Prevention; 3. Chizhou City Center for Disease Control and Prevention
Abstract:
Objective  To observe the effect of field deratization combined with routine control measures to check the source of schistosomiasis in areas where wild rats are the main source of infection. Methods  Three endemic villages of schistosomiasis were selected in Shitai County. Among them, the experimental village (Jitan Village and Shiquan Village) underwent routine control measures in combination with field deratization once, and the control village (Xibai Village) only received routine control measures. After one year, the density of wild rats and schistosomiasis infection were evaluated. Results  The density of rats before and after deratization was 9.91% (75/757) and 4.99% (34/681) in Jitan Village, and 5.31% (32/623) and 3.28% (17/519) in Shiquan Village, respectively (χ2=12.362, P<0.001; χ2=2.756,P>0.05). The density of rats before and after control in Xibai Village (the control village) was 3.44% (20/582) and 4.45% (21/472), respectively. The difference was insignificant (χ2=0.715, P>0.05). The infection rate of wild rats before and after deratization was 36.00% (27/75) and 17.65% (6/34) in Jitan Village(the experimental village), 18.75% (6/32) and 11.76% (2/17) in Shiquan Village, 5.00% (1/20) and 14.29% (3/21) in Xibai Village, respectively. There was no significant difference in infection rates before and after intervention among the three villages (χ2=2.756, 0.050, 0.226, all P>0.05). Conclusion  In schistosomiasis endemic areas where wild rats are the main source of infection, field deratization is feasible to reduce the density of wild rats and the risk of schistosomiasis transmission in a short period of time, but the effect needs to be further evaluated.
Keywords:Schistosomiasis  Infection source control  Wild rodents  Effect evaluation  Shitai County  
点击此处可从《热带病与寄生虫学》浏览原始摘要信息
点击此处可从《热带病与寄生虫学》下载免费的PDF全文
设为首页 | 免责声明 | 关于勤云 | 加入收藏

Copyright©北京勤云科技发展有限公司  京ICP备09084417号