First and Second Generation Lithotripsy in Children: Results, Comparison and Followup

During a 5-year period 32 children and adolescents 4 to 18 years old underwent 35 extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy (ESWL^* ) treatments for 37 calculi. The unmodified Dornier HM3 lithotriptor was used in 21 cases (60 percent) while the remaining cases were treated with the Siemen Lithostar lithotriptor. The HM3 necessitated general anesthesia in 67 percent of patients and the Lithostar necessitated intravenous sedation in 86 percent. The majority of pediatric lithotripsy treatments were performed on an outpatient basis (24) or during an overnight hospital stay (3) while 8 were done on an inpatient basis. Of the 37 stones treated with 1 ESWL session 68 percent resolved, 19 percent had residual fragments less than 4 mm., 8 percent had residual fragments greater than 4 mm. and 5 percent required an endoscopic procedure for resolution. When success rates by lithotriptor were examined no significant difference between the 2 machines was identified although the HM3 treated larger stones (p = 0.0499). There were no statistical differences in regard to success and the use of stents, patient age or stone location between the 2 lithotriptors. Three patients required adjuvant procedures, and complications and morbidity developed in 2 and 5, respectively. All children or parents were contacted for followup (range 7 to 67 months). One child required ESWL for a new stone while another passed a stone without intervention. Only 1 child with a residual fragment less than 4 mm. became symptomatic but needed no intervention while 1 of 3 with fragments greater than 4 mm. needed intervention. No patients required open or percutaneous intervention.