乳腺癌改良根治术与保乳综合治疗的效果比较（197例病例分析）

目的比较乳腺癌改良根治术与保留乳房综合治疗的疗效、不良反应。方法 98例改良根治术患者与99例保乳手术加放疗的患者进行比较。改良根治术患者中有49例接受术后放疗,其中8例行常规患侧锁骨上野及内乳野照射,另41例行患侧胸壁及锁骨上野照射;保乳术后皆全乳切线照射50 Gy,瘤床追加电子束照射10Gy。患侧锁骨上X线30 Gy＋电子束20 Gy。结果改良根治术组有3例因多发骨转移而死亡,另有6例出现胸壁复发,2例出现锁骨上淋巴结转移,1例出现腋下淋巴结转移,胸骨和肺转移各1例;保乳组有1例随访14月时因多发骨转移死亡,余患者均无复发。两组的总生存时间差异无统计学意义（P=0.234）,但无瘤生存时间保乳组要优于改良根治术组（P〈0.001）。保乳组患者的放疗不良反应中,84.6%为Ⅰ级反应,14.5%为Ⅱ级反应,仅1例出现Ⅲ级迟发性毒性反应。无皮肤、软组织坏死、乳房及上肢水肿等并发症。美容效果达到优83例（83.8%）,良4例（4.0%）,一般12例（12.1%）。满意率（优＋良）87.9%。结论与改良根治术比较,保乳综合疗法安全、可靠,美容效果满意,并发症发生率低,可保全患者的生理功能和社会心理状态,提高其生活质量。

Comparison of modified radical mastectomy with breast conservation therapy: an analysis of 197 cases

Objective To compare the efficacy and adverse effects of modified radical mastectomy with those of breast conservation therapy. Methods Ninety-eight patients with breast cancer were treated with modified radical mastectomy from 2001 to 2007 and 99 patients were treated with breast-conservation surgery and radiotherapy in the same period.Among the cases treated with modified radical mastectomy,49 received postoperative radiotherapy.In all patients receiving breast-conserving therapy,tangential field irradiat...