首页 | 本学科首页   官方微博 | 高级检索  
     

超低出生体重儿胃肠道内喂养24例临床分析
引用本文:Li ZH,Dong M,Sun XJ,Shen J,Wan WL,Qi JM,Wang C,Ding GF,Wang DH. 超低出生体重儿胃肠道内喂养24例临床分析[J]. 中华儿科杂志, 2011, 49(3): 222-225. DOI: 10.3760/cma.j.issn.0578-1310.2011.03.015
作者姓名:Li ZH  Dong M  Sun XJ  Shen J  Wan WL  Qi JM  Wang C  Ding GF  Wang DH
作者单位:北京协和医学院,北京协和医院儿科,中国医学科学院,100730
摘    要:
目的 回顾超低出生体重儿(ELBWI)胃肠道内喂养的临床资料,分析影响ELBWI胃肠道内喂养的各种因素.方法 对2000年1月至2010年1月间的24例ELBWI的临床资料进行回顾性分析,根据达到足量胃肠道内喂养的时间分为A组和B组,比较两组之间各项指标的差异.结果 24例ELBWI胎龄为(29.0±1.8)周(26.14~34.43周),出生体重为[(882±67)(730~970)]g,A组11例,达到足量喂养时间为(27±6)d;B组13例,达到足量喂养时间为(46±10)d.生后窒息(18.2%∶61.5%,P=0.047)、脐静脉插管时间长于10 d(18.2%∶61.5%,P=0.047)、机械通气时间长于14 d(27.3%∶76.9%,P=0.038)的比例,以及第21、28天的奶量[(88.9±35.4)ml:(37.4±34.9)ml,P=0.002;(121.1±37.4)ml:(53.2±33.1)ml,P=0.000]在两组间差异有统计学意义.胎龄、出生体重、动脉导管未闭、红细胞增多症、血糖异常、败血症、开奶日龄、开奶量、第1周加奶量、第2周加奶量、第3、7、14天奶量均无统计学差异.结论 窒息、脐静脉插管时间、机械通气时间可能影响ELBWI的胃肠道内喂养,喂养较顺利的ELBWI在生后第3周时即可表现出较好的耐受性.但因ELBWI的胃肠道内喂养可能受到多种因素的影响,在进行喂养时应针对不同情况制定个体化方案.
Abstract:
Objective To review the clinical data of enteral feeding of extremely low birth weight infants (ELBWI), and analyze the influencing factors. Method From Jan. 2000 to Jan. 2010, data of 31 ELBWI from Peking Union Medical College Hospital were retrospectively collected. ELBWI were assigned to different groups according to the time achieving full enteral feeding, comparison was done between two groups for enteral feeding. Result Twenty-four infants were analyzed, their mean gestational age was ( 29. 0 ±1.8) weeks (26. 14-34. 43 weeks), birth weight (882 ±67)g(730-970 g), there were 11 infants in group A, whose time for achieving full enteral feeding was (27 ±6)days, there were 13 infants in group B, whose time achieving full enteral feeding was ( 46 ± 10 ) days. The ratio of asphyxia ( 18.2% vs. 61.5%, P =0. 047 ), duration of umbilical vein catheterization longer than 10 days ( 18. 2% vs. 61.5%, P = 0. 047 ),and duration of mechanical ventilation longer than 14 days(27.3% vs. 76.9% ,P = 0. 038 )in group A was higher than in group B. The milk volume on the 21st and 28th day in group A was much more than that in groupB[(88.9±35.4)mlvs. (37.4±34.9) ml, P=0. 002;(121.1±37.4) ml vs. (53.2±33.1) ml,P =0. 000]. There were no significant differences between the two groups in gestational age, birth weight,patent ductus arterious, erythrocytosis, dysglycemia, sepsis, the time to begin enteral feeding, the beginning milk volume, the adding milk volume in the 1st, 2nd week, and the milk volume on the 3rd, 7th, 14th day.Conclusion Asphyxia, duration of umbilical vein catheterization, and duration of mechanical ventilation are likely to influence the enteral feeding of ELBWI, ELBWI with successful enteral feeding could show good tolerance in the 3rd week. But individual program should be made for enteral feeding of ELBWI, because enteral feeding could be influenced by multiple factors.

关 键 词:超低出生体重  早产儿  胃肠道内喂养

Clinical review of enteral feeding of extremely low birth weight infants
Li Zheng-hong,Dong Mei,Sun Xiu-jing,Shen Jing,Wan Wei-lin,Qi Jun-ming,Wang Chen,Ding Guo-fang,Wang Dan-hua. Clinical review of enteral feeding of extremely low birth weight infants[J]. Chinese journal of pediatrics, 2011, 49(3): 222-225. DOI: 10.3760/cma.j.issn.0578-1310.2011.03.015
Authors:Li Zheng-hong  Dong Mei  Sun Xiu-jing  Shen Jing  Wan Wei-lin  Qi Jun-ming  Wang Chen  Ding Guo-fang  Wang Dan-hua
Affiliation:Department of Pediatrics, Peking Union Medical College Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences, Beijing 100730, China.
Abstract:
Objective To review the clinical data of enteral feeding of extremely low birth weight infants (ELBWI), and analyze the influencing factors. Method From Jan. 2000 to Jan. 2010, data of 31 ELBWI from Peking Union Medical College Hospital were retrospectively collected. ELBWI were assigned to different groups according to the time achieving full enteral feeding, comparison was done between two groups for enteral feeding. Result Twenty-four infants were analyzed, their mean gestational age was ( 29. 0 ±1.8) weeks (26. 14-34. 43 weeks), birth weight (882 ±67)g(730-970 g), there were 11 infants in group A, whose time for achieving full enteral feeding was (27 ±6)days, there were 13 infants in group B, whose time achieving full enteral feeding was ( 46 ± 10 ) days. The ratio of asphyxia ( 18.2% vs. 61.5%, P =0. 047 ), duration of umbilical vein catheterization longer than 10 days ( 18. 2% vs. 61.5%, P = 0. 047 ),and duration of mechanical ventilation longer than 14 days(27.3% vs. 76.9% ,P = 0. 038 )in group A was higher than in group B. The milk volume on the 21st and 28th day in group A was much more than that in groupB[(88.9±35.4)mlvs. (37.4±34.9) ml, P=0. 002;(121.1±37.4) ml vs. (53.2±33.1) ml,P =0. 000]. There were no significant differences between the two groups in gestational age, birth weight,patent ductus arterious, erythrocytosis, dysglycemia, sepsis, the time to begin enteral feeding, the beginning milk volume, the adding milk volume in the 1st, 2nd week, and the milk volume on the 3rd, 7th, 14th day.Conclusion Asphyxia, duration of umbilical vein catheterization, and duration of mechanical ventilation are likely to influence the enteral feeding of ELBWI, ELBWI with successful enteral feeding could show good tolerance in the 3rd week. But individual program should be made for enteral feeding of ELBWI, because enteral feeding could be influenced by multiple factors.
Keywords:Extremely low birth weight  Preterm infant  Enteral feeding
本文献已被 万方数据 PubMed 等数据库收录!
设为首页 | 免责声明 | 关于勤云 | 加入收藏

Copyright©北京勤云科技发展有限公司  京ICP备09084417号