首页 | 本学科首页   官方微博 | 高级检索  
     


Reimagining Undergraduate Medical Education in a Post-COVID-19 Landscape
Authors:Matthew Z. Guo  Jawara Allen  Matthew Sakumoto  Amit Pahwa  Lekshmi Santhosh
Affiliation:1.Johns Hopkins School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD USA ;2.Department of Medicine, University of California-San Francisco, San Francisco, CA USA ;3.Department of Medicine, Department of Pediatrics, Johns Hopkins School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD USA
Abstract:
Online education due to the COVID-19 pandemic caused many medical schools to increasingly employ asynchronous and virtual learning that favored student independence and flexibility. At the same time, the COVID-19 pandemic highlighted existing shortcomings of the healthcare field in providing for marginalized and underserved communities. This perspective piece details the authors’ opinions as medical students and medical educators on how to leverage the aspects of pandemic medical education to train physicians who can better address these needs.KEY WORDS: undergraduate medical education, social determinants of health, virtual learning

“American medical education needed a revolution,” writes Professor Jon M. Barry in The Great Influenza: The Story of the Deadliest Pandemic in History1. He described a different era of medical education, a time in the late 1800s when medical students graduated without having ever touched a patient. The revolution began at Johns Hopkins Hospital with William Osler’s teaching hospital model for postgraduate training, a model that spread across the nation and has formed the foundation for modern medical education2. A few decades later, the Flexner Report commissioned by the American Medical Association codified recommendations for standardized curriculum based on Osler’s program at Hopkins, giving rise to the biomedical model of medical education3, 4. In the same decade, the 1918 influenza pandemic, one of the deadliest pandemics in the history of humankind, infected approximately one-third of the world’s population, causing an estimated 50 million deaths5. Clearly, as Barry describes, it was a time of great crisis, ripe for great change.The Flexner Report and 1918 pandemic thus led to many medical schools adopting the biomedical model and overhauling their curricula. Since then, shortcomings of the Flexner Report, such as limiting the opportunities of Black physicians and excluding social determinants of health from the medical model4, 6, have been acknowledged and medical education has increasingly prioritized diversity and inclusion and public health education to better serve the diverse health needs of society79. The biopsychosocial model of medicine has largely supplanted the biomedical model7, 8, and many medical schools have modified their biomedical curricula to incorporate systems-based learning and social determinants of health.Yet healthcare is far from perfect today, with issues of cost, access, and systemic inequality still plaguing patients. As medical students and medical educators, we strive for a medical education that will better prepare the next generation of physicians to address these failures of the profession. We also have experienced how the current COVID-19 pandemic, similar to the 1918 influenza pandemic, has caused great crises in healthcare and changes in medical education1012. As vaccines have made a post-COVID era more tangible, we believe the medical field is once again ripe for revolution. In this perspective piece, we detail how we can leverage the current flux in medical education, capitalizing on asynchronous and virtual learning with a focus on social determinants and disparities, to better train physicians who will be prepared to serve the public health in a post-COVID era.
Keywords:
设为首页 | 免责声明 | 关于勤云 | 加入收藏

Copyright©北京勤云科技发展有限公司  京ICP备09084417号