首页 | 本学科首页   官方微博 | 高级检索  
     

基于PET-CT与4DCT的NSCLC的PTV比较
引用本文:段益利,李建彬,张英杰,邵倩,徐敏,梁超前,郭延娈,尚东平,付政. 基于PET-CT与4DCT的NSCLC的PTV比较[J]. 中华放射肿瘤学杂志, 2015, 24(1): 42-45. DOI: 10.3760/cma.j.issn.1004-4221.2015.01.012
作者姓名:段益利  李建彬  张英杰  邵倩  徐敏  梁超前  郭延娈  尚东平  付政
作者单位:250117 济南,山东省肿瘤医院放疗三病区(段益利、李建彬、张英杰、邵倩、徐敏、梁超前、郭延娈)、PET-CT室(付政)、大孔径CT定位室(尚东平);济南大学 山东省医学科学院 医学与生命科学学院(段益利、郭延娈)
基金项目:国家自然科学基金青年基金项目,山东省科技发展计划项目,山东省自然科学基金项目
摘    要:
目的 比较NSCLC基于FDG PET-CT与4DCT定义的原发肿瘤PTV间位置及体积差异。方法 15例NSCLC患者序贯完成胸部3DCT、4DCT及FDG PET-CT扫描。在4DCT 10个呼吸时相图像上勾画原发肿瘤GTV并融合获得IGTV10。基于PET图像原发肿瘤SUVmax的15%勾画靶区定义为IGTVPET。分别基于IGTV10、IGTVPET外扩10 mm得到PTV4D和PTVPET。比较PTVPET与PTV4D间位置、体积及DI值差异。结果 PTVPET和PTV4D中心点位置差异无统计学意义(P=0.589、0.147、0.096)。PTVPET和PTV4D体积差异无统计学意义(P=0.156),但5例PTVPET相对于PTV4D变化率>20%,10例PTVPET>PTV4D,平均增加30%,5例PTVPET4D,平均减少11%。PTV4D对PTVPET的DI平均值为85%,有7%~46%的PTVPET未能被PTV4D所覆盖;PTVPET和PTV4D间的DI同三维运动矢量无相关性(P=0.134、0.405)。结论 尽管基于FDG PET-CT与基于4DCT所构建NSCLC原发肿瘤PTV中心点位置及体积差异并不显著,但相互DI值所反映的两靶区空间错位明显且这种错位与肿瘤位移大小并无相关性。

关 键 词:体层摄影术  正电子发射  氟脱氧葡萄糖  体层摄影术  X线计算机  四维  计划靶体积  包含度  肺肿瘤/放射疗法  
收稿时间:2014-05-26

Comparison of PTV based on FDG PET-CT versus 4DCT in non-small cell lung cancer
Duan Yili,Li Jianbin,Zhang Yingjie,Shao Qian,Xu Min,Liang Chaoqian,Guo Yanluan,Shang Dongping,Fu Zheng. Comparison of PTV based on FDG PET-CT versus 4DCT in non-small cell lung cancer[J]. Chinese Journal of Radiation Oncology, 2015, 24(1): 42-45. DOI: 10.3760/cma.j.issn.1004-4221.2015.01.012
Authors:Duan Yili  Li Jianbin  Zhang Yingjie  Shao Qian  Xu Min  Liang Chaoqian  Guo Yanluan  Shang Dongping  Fu Zheng
Affiliation:Department of Radiation Oncology, Shandong Cancer Hospital& Institute, Ji′nan 250117, China
Abstract:
Objective To compare the positional and volumetric differences of planning target volumes (PTVs) based on fluorodeoxyglucose (FDG) positron emission tomography/computed tomography (PET-CT) and four-dimensional CT (4DCT) for the primary tumor of non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). Methods Fifteen patients with NSCLC sequentially underwent three-dimensional CT(3DCT), 4DCT, and FDG PET-CT scans of the thorax. IGTV10 was defined on 10 respiratory phases of 4DCT images;IGTVPET was defined on PET-CT images using a fixed threshold of 15% of the maximum standard uptake values. PTV4D and PTVPET were obtained by adding a 10 mm margin around IGTV10 and IGTVPET. The differences in volume, position, and degree of inclusion (DI) between PTVPET and PTV4D were evaluated. Results There was no significant difference in centroid position between PTVPET and PTV4D (P=0.589, 0.147, and 0.096). There was no significant difference in volume between PTVPET and PTV4D (P=0.156);however, PET-CT resulted in an>20% change in PTV in 5 of 15 patients, the PTVPET volume increased (average 30%) in 10 patients, and the PTVPET volume decreased (average 11%) in 5 patients. The mean DI of PTV4D in PTVPET was 85%, and 7%-46% of PTVPET was not included within the PTV4D. The DI between PTV4D and PTVPET showed no significant correlation with the 3D motion vector (P=0.134 and 0.405). Conclusions Although there are no significant differences in centroid position and volume between PTVPET and PTV4D for the primary tumor of NSCLC, the spatial mismatch between them is apparent and the mismatch shows no correlation with tumor displacement.
Keywords:Tomography,positron-emission,fluorodeoxyglucose  Tomography,X-ray computed,four-dimensional  Planning target volume  Degree of inclusion  Lung neoplasms/radiotherapy
本文献已被 万方数据 等数据库收录!
点击此处可从《中华放射肿瘤学杂志》浏览原始摘要信息
点击此处可从《中华放射肿瘤学杂志》下载全文
设为首页 | 免责声明 | 关于勤云 | 加入收藏

Copyright©北京勤云科技发展有限公司  京ICP备09084417号