Automatic wide complex tachycardia differentiation using mathematically synthesized vectorcardiogram signals |
| |
Authors: | Anthony H. Kashou Sarah LoCoco Trevon D. McGill Christopher M. Evenson Abhishek J. Deshmukh David O. Hodge Daniel H. Cooper Sandeep S. Sodhi Phillip S. Cuculich Samuel J. Asirvatham Peter A. Noseworthy Christopher V. DeSimone Adam M. May |
| |
Affiliation: | 1. Department of Medicine, Mayo Clinic, Rochester Minnesota, USA ; 2. Division of Cardiovascular Diseases, Department of Medicine, Washington University School of Medicine in St. Louis, St. Louis Missouri, USA ; 3. Department of Health Sciences Research, Mayo Clinic, Rochester Minnesota, USA ; 4. Department of Cardiovascular Diseases, Mayo Clinic, Rochester Minnesota, USA |
| |
Abstract: | BackgroundAutomated wide complex tachycardia (WCT) differentiation into ventricular tachycardia (VT) and supraventricular wide complex tachycardia (SWCT) may be accomplished using novel calculations that quantify the extent of mean electrical vector changes between the WCT and baseline electrocardiogram (ECG). At present, it is unknown whether quantifying mean electrical vector changes within three orthogonal vectorcardiogram (VCG) leads (X, Y, and Z leads) can improve automated VT and SWCT classification.MethodsA derivation cohort of paired WCT and baseline ECGs was used to derive five logistic regression models: (i) one novel WCT differentiation model (i.e., VCG Model), (ii) three previously developed WCT differentiation models (i.e., WCT Formula, VT Prediction Model, and WCT Formula II), and (iii) one “all‐inclusive” model (i.e., Hybrid Model). A separate validation cohort of paired WCT and baseline ECGs was used to trial and compare each model''s performance.ResultsThe VCG Model, composed of WCT QRS duration, baseline QRS duration, absolute change in QRS duration, X‐lead QRS amplitude change, Y‐lead QRS amplitude change, and Z‐lead QRS amplitude change, demonstrated effective WCT differentiation (area under the curve [AUC] 0.94) for the derivation cohort. For the validation cohort, the diagnostic performance of the VCG Model (AUC 0.94) was similar to that achieved by the WCT Formula (AUC 0.95), VT Prediction Model (AUC 0.91), WCT Formula II (AUC 0.94), and Hybrid Model (AUC 0.95).ConclusionCustom calculations derived from mathematically synthesized VCG signals may be used to formulate an effective means to differentiate WCTs automatically. |
| |
Keywords: | electrocardiogram supraventricular tachycardia ventricular tachycardia wide complex tachycardia |
|
|