Monitoring biventricular pacing parameters depending on the left ventricle lead configuration |
| |
Authors: | Antonin Prochazka David Korpas |
| |
Affiliation: | 1.Institute of Biophysics and Informatics, 1st Medical Faculty, Charles University, Prague;;2.Institute of Nursing, Faculty of Public Policies, Silesian University, Opava, Czech Republic |
| |
Abstract: | OBJECTIVES:To evaluate whether pacing or sensing configuration has an effect on pacing parameters or their time progression. Three left ventricular (LV) pacing parameters were monitored – the LV pacing threshold, pacing impedance and intrinsic R-wave amplitude.METHODS:Data were collected at three intervals: during implantation; between the second and fifth month after implantation (first follow-up); and between the eighth and 15th month after implantation (second follow-up). Repeated-measures ANOVA was used for the statistical analysis.RESULTS:The impedance, but not its time progression, was significantly higher for the LV tip to LV ring configuration than for other configurations. R-wave amplitude and impedance increased significantly (without dependance on configurations) between implantation and first follow-up, as expected. The time progression of any parameter was not dependent on configuration of the LV lead.CONCLUSIONS:LV tip to LV ring is the best configuration for maintaining a high impedance level. It is better to maintain an individual approach for pacing threshold and R-wave amplitude, and their settings. |
| |
Keywords: | Cardiac resynchronization therapy Impedance Left ventricular pacing threshold Repeated measures ANOVA R-wave voltage |
|
|