首页 | 本学科首页   官方微博 | 高级检索  
检索        

Gd-DTPA磁共振肺灌注成像对猪肺动脉栓塞的诊断价值
引用本文:刘士远,董伟华,肖湘生,冯云,杨春山,徐雪元,张沉石,李成洲,李惠民,李玉莉.Gd-DTPA磁共振肺灌注成像对猪肺动脉栓塞的诊断价值[J].第二军医大学学报,2005,26(7):743-747.
作者姓名:刘士远  董伟华  肖湘生  冯云  杨春山  徐雪元  张沉石  李成洲  李惠民  李玉莉
作者单位:第二军医大学长征医院影像科,上海,200003;长征医院病理科
基金项目:This work is supported by Shanghai Grant for Post-Doctoral Study.
摘    要:目的:通过动物实验摸索磁共振肺灌注成像的最佳剂量,评价灌注成像对肺栓塞的诊断价值.方法:应用5、10、15、20、25ml的Gd-DTPA溶液以3ml/s的流速对6头中华猪进行三维动态增强肺实质灌注成像(机型为 Siemens Vision 1.5T);之后,用明胶海绵颗粒制备猪肺动脉栓塞模型,再以20ml剂量和3ml/s的速度进行肺灌注成像,评价其诊断急性肺栓塞的能力,并与数字减影血管造影(DSA)对照.结果: 0.125、0.25、0.375、0.5、0.625 mmol/kg 5种剂量时肺组织的强化率分别为(29.07±21.67)%、(60.39±12.21)%、(84.89±8.32%)、(87.80±8.49)%和(81.00±9.98)%;后三者与前两者比较差别有非常显著的意义(P<0.001).磁共振肺灌注成像肺栓塞病灶显示率100%(10/10),DSA为80%(8/10),栓塞区表现为楔形低信号灌注缺损,平均信号强度值为137.86±45.32,而正常的灌注区为330.14±46.52,两者差别非常显著(t=8.40,P=0.001).结论:猪肺灌注的满意剂量在0.375~0.5mmol/kg.肺动脉磁共振血管造影结合肺灌注图像显示肺栓塞比DSA好.

关 键 词:磁共振血管造影  血管造影术  数字减影  肺动脉栓塞  诊断
文章编号:0258-879X(2005)07-0743-05
修稿时间:2004年12月7日

Contrast-enhanced MRA of pulmonary artery combined with pulmonary perfusion imaging in pigs: a comparative study with DSA
LIU Shi-yuan,DONG Wei-hua,XIAO Xiang-sheng,FENG Yun,YANG Chun-shan,XU Xue-yuan,ZHANG Chen-Shi,LI Cheng-zhou,LI Hui-min,LI Yu-li.Contrast-enhanced MRA of pulmonary artery combined with pulmonary perfusion imaging in pigs: a comparative study with DSA[J].Academic Journal of Second Military Medical University,2005,26(7):743-747.
Authors:LIU Shi-yuan  DONG Wei-hua  XIAO Xiang-sheng  FENG Yun  YANG Chun-shan  XU Xue-yuan  ZHANG Chen-Shi  LI Cheng-zhou  LI Hui-min  LI Yu-li
Abstract:Objective:To optimize the injection protocol of contrast medium for contrast-enhanced MRA (CEMRA) of pulmonary artery and to evaluate the diagnostic value of CEMRA and pulmonary perfusion imaging (PPI) in an experimental model of acute pulmonary embolism. Methods:CEMRA and PPI were performed in 6 normal pigs with different doses of gadolinium contrast agent (5ml, 10ml, 15ml, 20ml and 25ml) at an injection rate of 3ml/s, and 3 pulmonary embolism models were injected with 20 ml contrast agent at 3 ml/s. DSA was also performed for comparison. Results:The signal intensities and the signal to noise ratios of the pulmonary arteries kept increasing with the dose increase of the contrast agent, but the best angio-pulmonary contrast dose was 10-15ml (0.25-0.375mmol/kg), while the optimal dose for PPI was 15-20ml (0.375-0.5mmol/kg). Although CEMRA demonstrated less obstructed pulmonary arteries than DSA (5/10 vs 8/10)did, it detected all obstructions when combined with PPI. The pulmonary infarction zones showed wedge-shaped perfusion defects on the PPI images, with the signal intensities lower than those of the normal areas (137.86±45.32 vs 330.14±46.52, P<0.001). Conclusion:It is suggested that the optimal dose of the contrast agent is 0.25mmol/kg to 0.375mmol/kg for CEMRA, and 0.375mmol/kg to 0.5mmol/kg for lung perfusion. CEMRA combined with PPI may be better than DSA in demonstrating pulmonary embolism.
Keywords:magnetic resonance angiography  angiography  digital subtraction  pulmonary embolism  diagnosis
本文献已被 CNKI 万方数据 等数据库收录!
点击此处可从《第二军医大学学报》浏览原始摘要信息
点击此处可从《第二军医大学学报》下载免费的PDF全文
设为首页 | 免责声明 | 关于勤云 | 加入收藏

Copyright©北京勤云科技发展有限公司  京ICP备09084417号