The benefit of cardiac resynchronization therapy and QRS duration: a meta-analysis

CRT and QRS Duration . Background: Cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT) improves outcomes in patients with heart failure (HF) because of reduced left ventricular systolic function and a wide QRS complex. Whether this benefit is consistent across all degrees of QRS widening is unclear. We performed a meta‐analysis of randomized clinical trials to evaluate the impact of QRS duration on the efficacy of CRT. Methods and Results: We searched MEDLINE and EMBASE databases for studies evaluating the efficacy of CRT in patients with HF. Only trials that reported subgroup data according to QRS duration were included. Hazard ratios (HR) with 95% confidence interval (CI) were calculated using a random effects model. Five trials involving 6,501 patients (4,437 with QRS ≥ 150 ms and 2,064 with QRS < 150 ms) were included. Three trials, enrolling patients with mild to moderate HF, compared CRT‐implantable cardioverter defibrillator with CRT, whereas CRT versus medical therapy was compared in the other 2 trials, which included patients with advanced HF. Based on the pooled estimate across the 5 studies, CRT significantly decreased the primary endpoint of death or hospitalization for HF in patients with QRS ≥ 150 ms (HR = 0.58, 95% CI: 0.50–0.68; P < 0.00001), but not in patients with QRS < 150 ms (HR = 0.95, 95% CI: 0.83–1.10; P = 0.51). These results were consistent across all degrees of HF severity. Conclusions: The benefit of CRT seems to be dependent on QRS duration. Available data suggest a significant benefit associated with CRT in patients with QRS ≥ 150 ms, but not in patients with QRS < 150 ms. Further studies are needed to identify patients with QRS < 150 ms who might benefit from CRT. (J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol, Vol. 23, pp. 163‐168, February 2012)