首页 | 本学科首页   官方微博 | 高级检索  
     

基于IMRT同步化疗疗效的食管鳞癌非手术分期临床分析
引用本文:陈俊强,林宇,苏婷凤,王丙乙,刘萍萍,李建成,吴君心,潘建基,陈传本. 基于IMRT同步化疗疗效的食管鳞癌非手术分期临床分析[J]. 中华放射肿瘤学杂志, 2017, 26(2): 155-159. DOI: 10.3760/cma.j.issn.1004-4221.2017.02.008
作者姓名:陈俊强  林宇  苏婷凤  王丙乙  刘萍萍  李建成  吴君心  潘建基  陈传本
作者单位:350014 福州,福建医科大学教学医院 福建省肿瘤医院放疗科(苏婷凤现单位:510800 广州市花都区人民医院肿瘤科)
基金项目:Natural Science Foundation of Fujian Province(2015J01377),Key Project of Fujian Science and Technology Department(2011Y0014),Key Featured Clinical Subject Construction Program of Fujian Province (2012)福建省自然科学基金(2015J01377),福建省科技厅重点项目(2011Y0014),福建省临床重点专科建设项目(2012)
摘    要:
目的 对IMRT同期化疗食管癌病例采用不同分期标准进行验证比较,探讨更准确、更适用的非手术治疗临床分期标准。方法 选取2008—2014年间就诊于本院242例IMRT化疗食管鳞癌患者的临床资料,用2009年中国分期、第6版分期和建议分期进行预后判断比较。Kaplan-Meier法计算生存率并Logrank检验,Cox模型预后分析。结果 3年样本数168例。全组患者3年生存率为47.4%,食管肿瘤体积和淋巴结转移最大径是影响预后的因素(P=0.000、0.000)。中国分期和第6版分期T3、T4期生存曲线有交叉(P=0.696、0.594),中国分期的N1、N2期生存曲线有交叉(P=0.068);建议分期采用食管肿瘤体积的T分期、淋巴结转移最大径的N分期以及结合的临床分期,各期的生存曲线分离度较好(P=0.000、0.000、0.000)。结论 采用食管肿瘤体积的T分期和淋巴结转移最大径的N分期结合进行IMRT化疗食管鳞癌的非手术临床分期能较好预测患者预后,简便易行。

关 键 词:食管肿瘤/调强放射疗法  食管肿瘤/化学疗法  肿瘤分期  预后  
收稿时间:2016-06-07

Clinical study of non-operative staging of esophageal squamous cell carcinoma underwent intensity-modulated radiotherapy combined with chemotherapy
Chen Junqiang,Lin Yu,Su Tingfeng,Wang Bingyi,Liu Pingping,Li Jiancheng,Wu Junxin,Pan Jianji,Chen Chuanben. Clinical study of non-operative staging of esophageal squamous cell carcinoma underwent intensity-modulated radiotherapy combined with chemotherapy[J]. Chinese Journal of Radiation Oncology, 2017, 26(2): 155-159. DOI: 10.3760/cma.j.issn.1004-4221.2017.02.008
Authors:Chen Junqiang  Lin Yu  Su Tingfeng  Wang Bingyi  Liu Pingping  Li Jiancheng  Wu Junxin  Pan Jianji  Chen Chuanben
Affiliation:Department of Radiotherapy,Teaching Hospital of Fujian Medical University,Fujian Provincial Cancer Hospital,Fuzhou 350014,China
Abstract:
Objective To compare different non-operative clinical staging criteria regarding their accuracy and feasibility in evaluation of patients with esophageal squamous cell carcinoma (ESCC) receiving concurrent intensity-modulated radiotherapy (IMRT) and chemotherapy.Methods A study was performed on clinical data from 242 ESCC patients who received concurrent IMRT and chemotherapy in our hospital from 2008 to 2014.Prognostic prediction was compared between the Chinese 2009 staging system,the 6th edition staging system,and a suggested staging system.The survival rates were calculated by the KaplanMeier method and analyzed by the log-rank test.A prognostic analysis was made by the Cox model.Results The 3-year sample size and overall survival rate were 168 and 47.4%,respectively.Esophageal tumor volume and the maximum diameter of metastatic lymph nodes were prognostic factors (P=0.000,0.000).An intersection of T3 and T4 survival curves was found in the Chinese staging system and the 6th version staging system (P=0.696,0.594),while an intersection of N1 and N2 survival curves was found in the Chinese staging system (P=0.068).The T staging based on esophageal tumor volume,N staging based on the maximum diameter of metastatic lymph nodes,and their combination could achieve a good separation of survival curves of different stages (P=0.000,0.000,0.000).Conclusions The T staging based on esophageal tumor volume combined with the N staging based on the maximum diameter of metastatic lymph nodes is an convenient non-operative clinical staging approach for prognostic prediction of ESCC patients receiving concurrent IMRT and chemotherapy.
Keywords:Esophageal neoplasms/intensity-modulated radiotherapy  Esophageal neoplasms/chemotherapy  Neoplasm staging  Prognosis
本文献已被 万方数据 等数据库收录!
点击此处可从《中华放射肿瘤学杂志》浏览原始摘要信息
点击此处可从《中华放射肿瘤学杂志》下载全文
设为首页 | 免责声明 | 关于勤云 | 加入收藏

Copyright©北京勤云科技发展有限公司  京ICP备09084417号