首页 | 本学科首页   官方微博 | 高级检索  
     


Clinical impact of the updated international postoperative pancreatic fistula definition in distal pancreatectomy
Authors:Jony van Hilst  Matteo de Pastena  Thijs de Rooij  Adnan Alseidi  Olivier R. Busch  Susan van Dieren  Casper H. van Eijck  Francesco Giovinazzo  Bas Groot Koerkamp  Giovanni Marchegiani  G. Ryne Marshall  Mohammed Abu Hilal  Claudio Bassi  Marc G. Besselink
Affiliation:1. Department of Surgery, Cancer Center Amsterdam, Amsterdam University Medical Center, Amsterdam, The Netherlands;2. Department of Surgery, Verona University Hospital, Verona, Italy;3. Department of Surgery, Virginia Mason Medical Center, Seattle, USA;4. Department of Surgery, Erasmus Medical Center Rotterdam, The Netherlands;5. Department of Surgery, Southampton University Hospital NHS Foundation Trust, Southampton, United Kingdom
Abstract:

Background

Postoperative pancreatic fistula (POPF) remains the most common complication after distal pancreatectomy. The International Study Group on Pancreatic Surgery definition of POPF is used worldwide. Recently, an update of the definition was published. The aim of this study was to determine the clinical impact of the update.

Methods

An international retrospective validation study, including patients who underwent DP (2005 –2016) in 5 centers was performed. Distribution of complications amongst POPF grades were compared for the old and updated definition.

Results

In total, 1089 patients were included. The incidence of POPF decreased with the updated definition from 47% to 24% (P < 0.01), largely because a downgrade of grade A and grade B into biochemical leak. Comparable morbidity was seen in the old and updated ‘no POPF group’ (Clavien –Dindo 3 5% vs. 6% P = 0.320 and hospital stay (7 vs. 7 days P = 0.301). The change in definition of POPF grade B resulted in more Clavien –Dindo 3 (38% vs. 51%) P < 0.01) and longer hospital stay (9 [9 –13] vs. 9 days [7 –15] P < 0.01) in the updated `grade B group’.

Conclusion

Applying the updated POPF definition showed improved discrimination between grades and should therefore be used to report POPF after DP.
Keywords:Correspondence: Marc G. Besselink   Amsterdam University Medical Center   Department of surgery   G4-196   PO BOX 22660   1100 DD Amsterdam   The Netherlands.
本文献已被 ScienceDirect 等数据库收录!
设为首页 | 免责声明 | 关于勤云 | 加入收藏

Copyright©北京勤云科技发展有限公司  京ICP备09084417号