Development and testing of multi-phase glazes for adhesive bonding to zirconia substrates |
| |
Authors: | Polyxeni Ntala Xiaohui Chen Jason Niggli Michael Cattell |
| |
Affiliation: | 1. Centre of Adult Oral Health, Queen Mary University of London, Barts and The London School of Medicine and Dentistry, Institute of Dentistry, Turner Street, London, E1 2AD, UK;2. Dental Physical Sciences, Queen Mary University of London, Barts and The London School of Medicine and Dentistry, Institute of Dentistry, Mile End Road, E1 4NS, UK |
| |
Abstract: | ObjectivesThe aims of the study were to develop and test multi-phase glaze coatings for zirconia restorations, so that the surface could be etched and adhesively bonded.MethodsZirconia disc specimens (n = 125, 16 mm × 1 mm) were cut from cylinders of Y-TZP (yttria-stabilized tetragonal zirconia polycrystals) ZS-Blanks (Kavo, Everest) and sintered overnight. Specimens were subjected to the recommended firing cycles, and next sandblasted. The specimens were divided into 5 groups of 25, with Group 1 as the sandblasted control. Groups 2–5 were coated with overglaze materials (P25 and IPS e.max Ceram glazes) containing secondary phases. Group 2 was (wt%): 10% hydroxyapatite (HA)/P25 glaze, Group 3: 20% IPS Empress 2 glass–ceramic/glaze, Group 4: 20% IPS Empress 2 glass/glaze and Group 5: 30% IPS Empress 2 glass/glaze. After sintering and etching, Monobond-S and composite resin cylinders (Variolink II, Ivoclar-Vivadent) were applied and light cured on the test surfaces. Specimens were water stored for 7 days. Groups were tested using the shear bond strength (SBS) test at a crosshead speed of 0.5 mm/min. Overglazed and the fractured specimen surfaces were viewed using secondary electron microscopy. Room and high temperature XRD and DSC were carried out to characterize the materials.ResultsThe mean (SD) SBS (MPa) of the test groups were: Group 1: 7.7 (3.2); Group 2: 5.6 (1.7); Group 3: 11.0 (3.0); Group 4: 8.8 (2.6) and Group 5: 9.1 (2.6). Group 3 was significantly different to the control Group 1 (p < 0.05). There was no significant difference in the mean SBS values between Group 1 and Groups 2, 4 and 5 (p > 0.05). Group 2 showed statistically lower SBS than Groups 3–5 (p < 0.05). Lithium disilicate fibres were present in Groups 3–5 and fine scale fibres were grown in the glaze following a porcelain firing cycle (Groups 4 and 5). XRD indicated a lithium disilicate/minor lithium orthophosphate phase (Group 3), and a tetragonal zirconia phase for the sintered Y-TZP ZS-Blanks. DSC and high temperature XRD confirmed the crystallization temperatures and phases for the IPS Empress 2 glass.ConclusionsThe application of a novel glass–ceramic/glaze material containing a major lithium disilicate phase might be a step in improving the bond strength of a zirconia substrate to a resin cement. |
| |
Keywords: | Glaze Adhesive bonding Zirconia Microscopy X-ray diffraction |
本文献已被 ScienceDirect 等数据库收录! |
|