首页 | 本学科首页   官方微博 | 高级检索  
     

氟西汀与米氮平治疗抑郁症的成本-效果分析
引用本文:张清盛. 氟西汀与米氮平治疗抑郁症的成本-效果分析[J]. 中国医药导报, 2010, 7(29): 20-21
作者姓名:张清盛
作者单位:四川省自贡市精神卫生中心,四川自贡,643020
摘    要:目的:研究氟西汀与米氮平治疗抑郁症的经济学效果。方法:抽取140例抑郁症患者病例分为两组,分别服用氟西汀与米氮平,均连续服用6周,对两组的疗效以及治疗花费进行分析。结果:氟西汀与米氮平临床有效率分别为90.0%和87.1%,治疗成本分别为3982.50元和4137.00元。结论:在疗效基本相当的情况下,氟西汀的药物经济学明显优于米氮平。

关 键 词:抑郁症  氟西汀  米氮平  成本-效果分析

The cost-effect analysis of Fluoxetine and Mirtazapine for depression
ZHANG Qingsheng. The cost-effect analysis of Fluoxetine and Mirtazapine for depression[J]. China Medical Herald, 2010, 7(29): 20-21
Authors:ZHANG Qingsheng
Affiliation:ZHANG Qingsheng (Zigong City Mental Health Center of Sichuan Province, Zigong 643020, China)
Abstract:Objective: To compare the efficacy between Mirtazapine and Fluoxetine in the treatment of depression. Methods: A total of 140 patients which were chosen to deliver into two groups received the Fluoxetine and Mirtazapine for 6 weeks. The efficacy and costs of the two groups were analyzed. Results: The efficient rates of Fluoxetine and Mirtazapine in clinic were 90.0% and 87.1% respectively. The costs in the treatment were 3 982.50 yuan and 4 137.00 yuan. Conclusion: Fluoxetine is better than Mirtazapine when the efficacy is in the same level.
Keywords:Depression  Fluoxetine  Mirtazapine  Cost-effect analysis
本文献已被 维普 万方数据 等数据库收录!
设为首页 | 免责声明 | 关于勤云 | 加入收藏

Copyright©北京勤云科技发展有限公司  京ICP备09084417号