Strong and sustained effector function of memory‐ versus naïve‐derived T cells upon T‐cell receptor RNA transfer: Implications for cellular therapy

Current protocols used to select CMV‐specific T cells for adoptive immunotherapy focus on virus‐specific memory T cells from seropositive donors. However, this strategy is not feasible in patients undergoing allogeneic haematopoietic stem‐cell transplantation (HSCT) from CMV‐seronegative donors. Here, we redirected T cells of CMV‐seronegative donors with a human genetically engineered TCR recognizing an HLA‐A*0201‐binding peptide epitope of CMVpp65. To facilitate clinical translation of this approach, we used a non‐viral expression system based on in vitro transcribed RNA and electroporation. Although memory and naïve‐derived T‐cell subsets were both efficiently transfected by TCR‐RNA, memory‐derived T cells showed much stronger levels of HLA‐A*0201‐restricted cytolytic activity to CMV‐infected fibroblasts and maintained acquired function for 5–10 days. In addition to redirection of CD8⁺ cytotoxic T cells, TCR‐RNA transfection was capable of redirecting CD4⁺ T cells into potent Ag‐specific Th cells that efficiently triggered maturation of DCs. Our data suggest that memory rather than naïve‐derived T cells are the preferred subset for transient TCR expression by RNA electroporation, providing more efficient and sustained virus‐specific CD4⁺ and CD8⁺ T‐cell function. CMV TCR‐RNA may represent a suitable therapeutic ‘off‐the‐shelf’ reagent to be used in severe CMV infections of HSCT patients when endogenous CMV‐specific T‐cell immunity is insufficient.