Common data elements for posttraumatic stress disorder research |
| |
Authors: | Kaloupek Danny G Chard Kathleen M Freed Michael C Peterson Alan L Riggs David S Stein Murray B Tuma Farris |
| |
Affiliation: | a Veterans Affairs National Center for Posttraumatic Stress Disorder, Veterans Affairs Boston Healthcare System and Division of Psychiatry, Boston University School of Medicine, Boston, MA b Cincinnati Veterans Affairs Medical Center, and Department of Psychiatry, University of Cincinnati, Cincinnati, OH c Deployment Health Clinical Center, Walter Reed Army Medical Center, Washington, DC d Department of Psychiatry, Uniformed Services University of the Health Sciences, Bethesda, MD e Center for the Study of Traumatic Stress, Uniformed Services University of the Health Sciences, Bethesda, MD f Center for Deployment Psychology, Uniformed Services University of the Health Sciences, Bethesda, MD g Department of Psychiatry, University of Texas Health Science Center at San Antonio, San Antonio, TX h Departments of Psychiatry and Family and Preventive Medicine at the University of California, San Diego, La Jolla, CA i Division of Adult Translational Research and Treatment Development, National Institute of Mental Health, Bethesda, MD |
| |
Abstract: | Kaloupek DG, Chard KM, Freed MC, Peterson AL, Riggs DS, Stein MB, Tuma F. Common data elements for posttraumatic stress disorder research.An expert work group with 7 members was formed under the cosponsorship of 5 U.S. federal agencies to identify common data elements for research related to posttraumatic stress disorder (PTSD). The work group reviewed both previous and contemporary measurement standardization efforts for PTSD research and engaged in a series of electronic and live discussions to address a set of predefined aims. Eight construct domains relevant to PTSD were identified: (1) traditional demographics, (2) exposure to stressors and trauma, (3) potential stress moderators, (4) trauma assessment, (5) PTSD screening, (6) PTSD symptoms and diagnosis, (7) PTSD-related functioning and disability, and (8) mental health history. Measures assigned to the core data elements category have relatively low time-and-effort costs in order to make them potentially applicable across a wide range of studies for which PTSD is a relevant condition. Measures assigned to the supplemental data elements category have greater costs but generally demonstrate stronger psychometric performance and provide more extensive information. Accordingly, measures designated as supplemental are recommended instead of or in addition to corresponding core measures whenever resources and study design allow. The work group offered 4 caveats that highlight potential limitations and emphasize the voluntary nature of standardization for PTSD-related measurement. |
| |
Keywords: | Diagnostic techniques and procedures Outcome assessment Rehabilitation Stress disorders, post-traumatic |
本文献已被 ScienceDirect PubMed 等数据库收录! |
|