Quality of clinical supervision as perceived by specialist registrars in a university and district teaching hospital

BACKGROUND: Clinical supervision promotes the professional development of specialist registrars (SpRs). Our objective was to investigate and compare the perceived quality of supervision (PQS) in a university teaching hospital (UTH) and a district teaching hospital (DTH) and to identify aspects of supervision that could be improved. METHODS: The Cleveland Clinic's teaching effectiveness instrument (CCTEI) was used to measure the quality of supervision of attending doctors. Fifteen items reflecting good teaching ability were rated on a 5-point Likert-scale (1-5 = poor-excellent). RESULTS: SpRs rated 47 attending doctors using the CCTEI. A total of 416 ratings were obtained. Overall, the mean PQS was 3.85 (SD = 0.29) in the DTH and 3.56 (SD = 0.44) in the UTH (P = 0.02). A significant difference in PQS was found in 6 items. The supervisors in the DTH scored better on all these items. The best predictor of PQS was the item 'Organises time to allow for both teaching and care giving'. CONCLUSIONS: Overall, PQS was better in the DTH compared to the UTH. In both settings, generating a good learning environment and respecting the autonomy of the SpRs scored favourably. Supervisory roles focusing on improving cost-effective practice and communicative skills need more emphasis.