Total parathyroidectomy versus total parathyroidectomy with autotransplantation for secondary hyperparathyroidism: systematic review and meta-analysis

Background: Total parathyroidectomy (tPTX) and total parathyroidectomy with autotransplantation (tPTX?+?AT) are effective and inexpensive treatments for secondary hyperparathyroidism (sHPT), but we do not know which one is the optimal approach. Therefore, we undertook a meta-analysis to compare the safety and efficacy of these two surgical procedures.

Methodology: Studies published in English on PubMed, Embase and the Cochrane Library from inception to 27 September 2016 were searched systematically. Eligible studies comparing tPTX with tPTX?+?AT for sHPT were included and Review Manager v5.3 was used.

Results: Eleven studies were included in this meta-analysis. Ten cohort studies and one randomized controlled trial (RCT) involving 1108 patients with sHPT were identified. There was no significant difference in the prevalence of surgical complications (relative risk [RR], 1.71; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.77–3.79; p?=?.19), all-cause mortality (RR, 0.68; 95% CI, 0.33–1.39; p?=?.29), sHPT persistence (RR, 3.81; 95% CI, 0.56–25.95; p?=?.17) or symptomatic improvement (RR, 1.02; 95% CI, 0.91–1.13; p?=?.79). tPTX could reduce the risk of sHPT recurrence (RR, 0.19; 95% CI, 0.09–0.41; p?p?=?.01) compared with tPTX?+?AT. Simultaneously, tPTX increased the risk of hypoparathyroidism (RR, 2.63; 95% CI, 1.06–6.51; p?=?.04).

Conclusions: We found tPTX and tPTX?+?AT to be useful methods for sHPT treatment. tPTX was superior for reducing the risk of sHPT recurrence and reoperation than tPTX?+?AT but, due to a lack of high statistical-power RCTs, comparative studies will be needed in the future.