尿激酶动脉溶栓与重组组织型纤溶酶原激活剂静脉溶栓治疗急性缺血性卒中的疗效比较

目的 评价尿激酶动脉溶栓与重组组织纤溶酶原激活剂(recombinant tissue plasminogen activator,rtPA)静脉溶栓治疗急性缺血性卒中的疗效和安全性.方法 发病6 h内的急性脑梗死患者43例,其中动脉溶栓组31例行超选择性动脉溶栓,静脉溶栓组12例行rtPA静脉溶栓.观察动脉溶栓组血管再通.90 d时改良Rankin量表(modified Ranlkin scale,mRS)评分评价2组转归.结果 动脉溶栓组完全再通18例(58.1%),部分再通7例(22.6%),血管再通率为80.6%,并发有症状颅内出血3例,死亡1例.尿激酶动脉溶栓组与rtPA静脉溶栓组90 d时转归良好率(74.2%对66.7%,x2=0.24,P=0.622)和有症状颅内出血发生率(9.68%对8.33%,x2=0.19,P=0.892)均无显著差异.结论 在治疗时间窗内尿激酶动脉溶栓能显著提高闭塞血管再通率,改善患者急性期临床症状和远期转归,近期疗效和远期转归均与rtPA静脉溶栓相当.

Comparative efficacy of intra-arterial thrombolysis with urokinase and intravenous thrombolysis with recombinant tissue plasminogen activator for acute ischemic stroke

Objective To evaluate the efficacy and safety of intra-arterial thrombolysis with urokinase and intravenous thrombolysis with recombinant tissue plasminogen activator (rtPA) for acute ischemic stroke. Methods A total of 43 patients with acute ischemic stroke within 6 hours of onset were included, 31 of them underwent superselective intra-arterial thrombolysis in the intra-arterial thrombolysis group and 12 of them underwent intravenous thrombolysis with rtPA in the intravenous thrombolysis group. Vascular recanalization was observed in the intra-arterial thrombolysis group, and the modified Rankin scale (mRS) scores at day 90 were used to evaluate the outcomes in both groups. Results Eighteen patients (58.1%)had complete recanalization and 7 (22.6%) had partial recanalization in the intra-arterial thrombolysis group. The recanalization rate was 80.6%, 3 complicated symptomatic intracranial hemorrhage, and 1 died. There vere no significant differences between the good outcome rate (74.2% vs. 66.7%, x2 =0.24, P=0.622) and the incidence of symptomatic intracranial hemorrhage at 90 d (9. 68% vs. 8. 33%, x2 =0. 19, P =0. 892). Conclusions Urokinase intra arterial thrombolysis within the time window can significantly improve the recanalization rate of the occluded vessels and improve the clinical symptoms of the patents in acute phase and long term outcomes. Their short-term efficacy and long-term outcomes are almost the same with intravenous thrombolysis with rtPA.