首页 | 本学科首页   官方微博 | 高级检索  
检索        

浙江省新型农村合作医疗降低就医经济风险能力的评价研究
引用本文:崔欣,罗力,李春芳,潘迎冰,蔡琳,宋明山,叶真,徐润龙,曾国经,陈瑜,郭清,郝模.浙江省新型农村合作医疗降低就医经济风险能力的评价研究[J].中国卫生经济,2006,25(3):36-40.
作者姓名:崔欣  罗力  李春芳  潘迎冰  蔡琳  宋明山  叶真  徐润龙  曾国经  陈瑜  郭清  郝模
作者单位:1. 复旦大学卫生发展战略研究中心,上海,200032
2. 浙江省卫生厅,杭州,310006
3. 杭州师范学院医学院,杭州,310012
基金项目:高等学校博士学科点专项科研项目;中国科学院资助项目;卫生部国外贷款办公室农村卫生政策应用研究项目;上海市高等学校优秀青年教师后备人选计划
摘    要:目的:评价浙江省新型农村合作医疗实施对就医经济风险的影响。方法:应用就医经济风险评价指标RR值和校正RR值,分别计算和比较秀洲区、开化县和常山县各类就医人群获得新型农村合作医疗补偿前后就医经济风险。结果:(1)秀洲区方案显现出费用段升高。降低就医经济风险能力升高的特点:开化县方案对就医经济风险的降低主要表现在3001-5000元费用段和10000元以上费用段:常山县方案对就医经济风险的降低主要表现在10000元以上费用段。3个地区新型农村合作医疗方案均以不同形式体现了大痛统筹的指导思想。(2)由于3个地区方案侧重住院费用补偿。降低门诊就医经济风险的能力均较低。(3)秀洲区住院人群校正RR值下降了26.0%,开化县为24,9%,常山县为21.3%,秀洲区的方案对住院人群就医经济风险的降低更为有利,开化县次之,常山县最末。(4)秀洲区贫困人群校正RR值下降了34.6%,开化县为14.5%,常山县为8.8%。秀洲区的方案对贫困人群就医经济风险的降低更为有利,开化县次之,常山县最末。(5)秀洲区高危人群校正RR值下降了20.0%,开化县为16.6%.常山县为8.8%,秀洲区的方案对高危人群就医经济风险的降低更为有利,开化县次之,常山县最末。

关 键 词:农村  新型农村合作医疗  评价  就医经济风险
文章编号:1003-0743(2006)03-0036-05
收稿时间:2006-01-09
修稿时间:2006-01-09

Ability Evaluation of New-type Cooperative Medical System to Reduce Economic Risk for Medical Service in Zhejiang Province
Cui Xin, Luo Li, Li Chunfang,et al..Ability Evaluation of New-type Cooperative Medical System to Reduce Economic Risk for Medical Service in Zhejiang Province[J].Chinese Health Economics,2006,25(3):36-40.
Authors:Cui Xin  Luo Li  Li Chunfang  
Institution:Research Institute of Health Development Strategies, Fudan University, Shanghai, 200032, PRC
Abstract:Objective: Evaluating the impact of the New-type Cooperative Medical System(NCMS) on economic risk for medical service(ERMS) in the experimental province. Methods: Using the evaluative index of ERMS,such as RR, adjusted RR,and calculating separately the change of ERMS after the compensation of the NCMS in three experimental counties. Result: After the compensation of RCMS,the ERMS of various groups of patients in the three counties was reduced:(1)In Xiuzhou, the more the expenditure was,the more the ERMS was reduced; In Kaihua,the ERMS was reduced mostly in the section between 3 000 and 5 000 yuan,also more than 10 000 yuan; In Changshan,the ERMS was reduced mostly in the section of more than 10 000 yuan. (2)In the three counties, they all especially focused on the inpatients,so the outpatients were less compensated. (3)The RR of the inpatients in Xiuzhou was reduced by 26.0%,the one in Kaihua was reduced by 24.9%, and the one in Changshan was reduced by 21.3%. (4)The RR of the poor in Xiuzhou was reduced by 34.6%,the one in Kaihua was reduced by 14.5%,and the one in Changshan was reduced by 8.8%.(5)The RR of the high risks in Xiuzhou was reduced by 20.0%,the one in Kaihua was reduced by16.6%, and the one in Changshan was reduced by 8.8%.These figures indicated the project in Xiuzhou lean to the inpatients,the poor and the high risks more than other counties.
Keywords:rural areas  NCMS  evaluation  ERMS
本文献已被 CNKI 维普 万方数据 等数据库收录!
设为首页 | 免责声明 | 关于勤云 | 加入收藏

Copyright©北京勤云科技发展有限公司  京ICP备09084417号