护理专业课程设置中两种分科的认可度调查分析 |
| |
引用本文: | 陈桂园 季兰芳 胡 野等. 护理专业课程设置中两种分科的认可度调查分析[J]. 护理实践与研究, 2014, 0(5): 114-115 |
| |
作者姓名: | 陈桂园 季兰芳 胡 野等 |
| |
作者单位: | 金华市浙江省金华职业技术学院医学院护理学部,321017 |
| |
摘 要: | 目的:了解目前两种护理分科的认可度,找出生命周期课程设置存在的问题,为今后教材的编写提供依据,为护理专业课程设置的改革设置疑问,引导思考。方法:采用自行设计的问卷,调查人民卫生出版社相关课程的编者和我院首届国培班学员对两种护理分科的认知状态和倾向性。结果:67.1%的教师倾向于临床分科,32.9%的教师倾向于生命周期分科。结论:生命周期课程设置存在问题较多,改革阻力较大,但已经渐渐深入人心。
|
关 键 词: | 护理专业 课程设置 生命周期 |
Investigation and analysis the recognition of two kinds division in nursing curriculum setting |
| |
Affiliation: | CHEN Gui -yuan,Jl Lan - fang,HU Ye,et al(The Medical College of Jinhua Polytechnic,Jinhua 321017) |
| |
Abstract: | Objective: To understand the acceptance of two kinds of nursing curriculum recently and find out the existing problems of setting the life cycle curriculum. In order to provide the basis for the compilation of teaching materials,set questions for nursing professional curriculum and guide thinking. Methods: A self- designed questionnaire,editors related courses from People' s Medical Publishing House and the first national training students was sueveyed about the two curriculum of cognitive status and tendency. Results: 67. 1% teachers tend to clinical division,32. 9% teachers tend to life cycle division. Conclusion: There are many problems in the setting of curriculum of life cycle,but has gradually win support among the people,although reform resistance are large. |
| |
Keywords: | Nursing profession Curriculum setting Life cycle |
本文献已被 CNKI 维普 等数据库收录! |
|