保守与手术治疗肱骨骨折的效果比较

目的比较保守治疗与手术治疗肱骨骨折的临床效果。方法 68例肱骨骨折患者作为研究对象,随机分为对照组和观察组,每组34例。对照组患者行保守治疗(手法复位),观察组患者行手术治疗(切开内固定术)。比较两组患者的临床治疗效果以及骨折康复效果。结果对照组患者临床治疗总有效率为82.35%,观察组患者临床治疗总有效率为97.06%;观察组患者的临床治疗总有效率明显高于对照组,差异具有统计学意义(P<0.05)。对照组患者骨折康复总有效率为76.47%,观察组患者骨折康复总有效率为94.12%;观察组患者骨折康复临床总有效率显著高于对照组,差异具有统计学意义(P<0.05)。结论手术治疗肱骨骨折与保守治疗肱骨骨折相比较,手术治疗更有利于骨折的恢复,且临床效果优于保守治疗,在临床中应值得推广应用。

Comparison of effect of conservation and surgical treatment of humeral fracture

Objective To compare and analyze the clinical effect of conservative and surgical treatment for humeral fracture. Methods A total of 68 humeral fracture patients as study subjects were randomly divided into control group and observation group, with 34 cases in each group. The control group received conservative treatment(manipulative reduction), and the observation group received surgical treatment(open internal fixation). The clinical effect and rehabilitation effect of fracture was compared between the two groups. Results The total effective rate of clinical treatment was 82.35% in the control group, which was 97.06% in the observation group. The total effective rate of clinical treatment in the observation group was obviously higher than that in the control group, and the difference was statistically significant(P<0.05). The total effective rate of fracture rehabilitation was 76.47% in the control group, which was 94.12% in the observation group. The total effective rate of fracture rehabilitation in the observation group was significantly higher than that in the control group. Their difference was statistically significant(P<0.05). Conclusion Compared with conservative treatment, surgical treatment shows better clinical effect in the treatment of humeral fracture, and is more conducive to the recovery of fracture. It is worthy of clinical promotion and application.