Value of whole breast magnetic resonance elastography added to MRI for lesion characterization |
| |
Authors: | Corinne Balleyguier Aicha Ben Lakhdar Ariane Dunant Marie‐Christine Mathieu Suzette Delaloge Ralph Sinkus |
| |
Affiliation: | 1. Radiology Department, Gustave Roussy, Villejuif, France;2. Paris‐Sud University, Orsay, France;3. Department of Medical Biology and Pathology, Gustave Roussy, Villejuif, France;4. Department of Statistics, Gustave Roussy, Villejuif, France;5. Department of Medical Oncology, Gustave Roussy, Villejuif, France;6. Paris Diderot University, Sorbonne Paris Cité, France;7. INSERM U773, Centre de Recherche Biomédicale Bichat‐Beaujon, Paris, France;8. BHF Centre of Excellence, Division of Imaging Sciences and Biomedical Engineering, King's College London, King's Health Partners, St. Thomas' Hospital, London, UK |
| |
Abstract: | The purpose of this work was to assess the diagnostic value of magnetic resonance elastography (MRE) in addition to MRI to differentiate malignant from benign breast tumors, and the feasibility of performing MRE on the whole breast. MRE quantified biomechanical properties within the entire breast (50 slices) using an 11 min acquisition protocol at an isotropic image acquisition resolution of 2 × 2 × 2 mm3. Fifty patients were included. Finally, 43 patients (median age 52) with a suspect breast lesion detected by mammography and/or ultrasound were examined by MRI and MRE at 1.5 T. The viscoelastic parameters, i.e. elasticity (Gd), viscosity (Gl), the magnitude of the complex shear modulus , and the phase angle , were measured via MRE and correlated with MRI Breast Imaging—Reporting and Data System (BI‐RADS) score, histological type, and histological grade. Stroma component and angiogenesis were also correlated with viscoelastic properties. In the 43 lesions, Gd decreased and y increased with the MRI BI‐RADS score (pGd = 0.02, py = 0.002), whereas (Gl) and y were increased in malignant lesions (pGl = 0.045, py = 0.0004). The area under the curve increased from 0.84 for MRI BI‐RADS alone to 0.92 with the MRI BI‐RADS and y (AUC increase +0.08; 95% CI (?0.003; 0.16)). Lesion characterization using the y parameter increased the diagnostic accuracy. The phase angle y was found to have a significant role (p = 0.01) in predicting malignancy independently of the MRI BI‐RADS. Interestingly, histological analysis showed no correlation between viscoelastic parameters and percentage and type of stroma, CD34 quantification of vessels, or histological grade. The combination of MRE and MRI improves the diagnostic accuracy for breast lesions in the studied cohort. In particular, the phase angle y was found to have a significant role in predicting malignancy in addition to BI‐RADS. |
| |
Keywords: | breast cancer diagnosis magnetic resonance elastography MRI |
|
|