| Abstract: | Urine samples from 10 workers from an asbestos cement factory and from a control group of 10 workers from a foundry, were obtained; drastic precautions were taken to avoid contamination. Each urinary mineral fibre was sized and identified by transmission electron microscopy. Results show that contamination problems encountered by other authors have been overcome and that the workers exposed to chrysotile appear to excrete more chrysotile fibres, but that this difference is not statistically significant. Possibly only a few of the exposed workers are significantly exposed to asbestos, the overall exposure level being very low. The degradability of chrysotile fibres in biological fluids or the retention of fibres in some organ could explain the lack of apparent correlation between exposure and urinary concentration. Unexpectedly high concentrations of crocidolite fibres of unknown origin were detected in both groups of workers. |
