Is fecundability associated with month of birth? An analysis of 19th and early 20th century family reconstitution data from The Netherlands |
| |
Authors: | Smits, LJ Van Poppel, FW Verduin, JA Jongbloet, PH Straatman, H Zielhuis, GA |
| |
Affiliation: | Department of Medical Informatics, Epidemiology and Statistics, University of Nijmegen, The Netherlands. |
| |
Abstract: | The relationship between fecundability and month of birth was investigatedin a cohort of 1526 women who married between 1802 and 1929, using onlywomen whose first marriage occurred before the age of 35 years. On thebasis of their time to pregnancy (TTP, calculated as time between weddingand first birth minus gestational length), women were categorized into twogroups: fecunds (TTP up to 12 months or prenuptial conceptions, n = 1348)and subfecunds (TTP >18 months, n = 118). By use of logistic regression,cosinor functions with a period of 1 year or 6 months and variable shiftand amplitude were fitted through the monthly odds of subfecunds versusfecunds. The best fitting curve was unimodal, with a zenith in September (P= 0.13 for H0: no differences). Exclusion of childless women (n = 36,minimum follow-up 5 years) from the subfecunds led to a similar curve (P< 0.01), while childless women, as compared with fecunds, showed a birthdistribution that was best represented with a bimodal curve with zeniths inJanuary and July (P = 0.06). This study provides evidence for the existenceof differences in fecundability by month of birth. The cause of thisrelationship is unclear, but may lie in a melatonin-dependent circannualvariability of the quality of the oocyte. |
| |
Keywords: | |
本文献已被 Oxford 等数据库收录! |
|