Cell proliferation marker MCM2, but not Ki67, is helpful for distinguishing between minimally invasive follicular carcinoma and follicular adenoma of the thyroid

AIMS: To compare cell proliferation markers, minichromosome maintenance protein 2 (MCM2) and Ki67, in minimally invasive follicular carcinoma (MIFC) and follicular adenoma (FA) of the thyroid and among MIFCs with different diagnostic criteria. METHODS AND RESULTS: Twenty-two MIFCs and 20 FAs were immunohistochemically stained for MCM2 and Ki67. The MIFCs were subdivided into six Group 1 tumours with both capsular and vascular invasions, seven Group 2 tumours with vascular invasion only and nine Group 3 tumours with capsular invasion only. The MCM2 and Ki67 indices were calculated, counting more than 1000 tumour cells in the most frequently positive areas. In total and Groups 1-3 MIFCs and in FAs, the average MCM2 index was 26.7 +/- 11.0, 28.4 +/- 8.6, 26.3 +/- 14.8, 25.9 +/- 8.4 and 10.7 +/- 4.5, respectively, whereas the average Ki67 index was 2.07 +/- 1.65, 1.93 +/- 2.02, 2.49 +/-1.38, 1.84 +/- 1.5 and 1.78 +/- 0.92, respectively. There was a significant difference in the MCM2 index, but not in the Ki67 index, between each category of MIFCs and FA (P < 0.01). However, neither the MCM2 index nor the Ki67 index showed a statistically significant difference among the subgroups of MIFC. CONCLUSIONS: MCM2, but not Ki67, is a helpful marker for differentiating MIFC from FA. The tumour cell proliferative activity supports the histological criteria based on diagnosing MIFC by either capsular or vascular invasion only.