首页 | 本学科首页   官方微博 | 高级检索  
     

腹腔镜筋膜内子宫切除术与经腹全子宫切除术效果比较
引用本文:高蕾. 腹腔镜筋膜内子宫切除术与经腹全子宫切除术效果比较[J]. 蚌埠医学院学报, 2007, 32(1): 60-61
作者姓名:高蕾
作者单位:安徽省蚌埠市第三人民医院妇产科, 233000
摘    要:
目的: 比较腹腔镜筋膜内子宫切除术(classic intrafascial supracervical hysterectomy,CISH)与经腹全子宫切除术的效果。方法: 将126例良性子宫病变患者随机分为CISH组64例和剖腹组62例,比较两组术中、术后情况。结果: CISH组的手术时间、术中出血量、术后出血、排气时间、病率、住院时间较经腹组显著减少(P<0.005~P<0.001)。结论: 应用CISH效果明显优于传统的经腹全子宫切除术。

关 键 词:子宫切除术   腹腔镜术   经腹全子宫切除术
文章编号:1000-2200(2007)01-0060-02
收稿时间:2005-12-12
修稿时间:2005-12-12

Comparison of effects of classic intrafascial supracervical hysterectomy and total abdominal hysterectomy
GAO Lei. Comparison of effects of classic intrafascial supracervical hysterectomy and total abdominal hysterectomy[J]. Journal of Bengbu Medical College, 2007, 32(1): 60-61
Authors:GAO Lei
Affiliation:Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Bengbu Third People's Hospital, Bengbu 233000, China
Abstract:
Objective:To compare the effects of classic intrafascial supracervical hysterectomy(CISH) and total abdominal hysterectomy.Methods:One hundred and twenty-six patients diagnosed as pathologic changes of uterine were randomly divided into the group treated by CISH and the group treated by total abdominal hysterectomy.Both intraoperative and postoperative conditions were compared.Results:The operative time,intraoperative blood loss,the postoperative blood loss,the anus gas passage time and hospital stay after operation was less than that of group treated by total abdominal hysterectomy(P<0.005-P<0.001).Conclusions:The effect of CISH is significantly better than that of total abdominal hysterectomy.
Keywords:hysterectomy  peritonescopy  total abdominal hysterectomy
本文献已被 CNKI 维普 万方数据 等数据库收录!
点击此处可从《蚌埠医学院学报》浏览原始摘要信息
点击此处可从《蚌埠医学院学报》下载全文
设为首页 | 免责声明 | 关于勤云 | 加入收藏

Copyright©北京勤云科技发展有限公司  京ICP备09084417号